raxxorrax

9 ms·

1.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Not at all as you did not apply the quality control to the data as you suggested it needed to have to come to a conclusion.
2.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Also I doubt the content is proliferated through facebook and whatsapp. Perhaps by some careless people and that might lead to further investigations, but the proposal is just extremely inefficient and costs are too high.
3.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
> Yes if we ban E2E then it will solve the problem of CSAM No, because content like CSAM will immediately switch channels and you cannot really ban encryption.
4.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
More funding for teachers that can put eyes on the target because child abuse happens in the vicinity of the victim. If you really want an efficient solution, you have to start there instead of putting everyone under suspicion. The exceptio
5.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
If the Gestapo did have WhatsApp data it would have been severely more powerful. You are correct that I believe the cost is quite high compared to the very low returns of invasions of privacy like this. Which probably amounts to none. We in
6.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
The distance to representatives does matter a lot. The EU even agrees with the principle of subsidiary policy making.
7.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Some political scientist argue that after the Lisbon treaty the deficit is a myth but I don't think their statements have much merit. They often argue that parliamentary control wouldn't be the only metric that would quantify demo
8.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
> Btw, I don't think moderation is hard. It probably depends on the user base of the platform, but I believe it could be one of the worst jobs in the world. If you like the community and content, great, but the usual employed modera
9.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
I really would like to meet someone from the other 25%. Just out of curiosity to experience a completely different kind of reasoning. Perhaps they believe the product would be cheaper with abdicating the feature?
10.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
I think it unrealistic to believe that accountability tools work and it is quite crazy to judge people on these metrics. If management cannot define a sensible output at the end of a work shift, they seem to be overtaxed with their responsi
11.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Just quit these companies. Market allows for it and when you do clearly communicate the reason. Also building tools to disrupt the metrics should be easy. Company time of course. If they ask for a high score a dependable worker delivers. I
12.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
That case is a lesser form of anonymity since the platform knows your identity. With laws like the EU just recently voted for, this can become a problem. Sure, they may log your IP and your ISP could connect the dots, but it still provides
13.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Anonymity has a lot of obvious benefits, especially if things get heated up and personal. But the main thing is to stop those regularly demanding consequences for speech, which certainly are not arguing in good faith either. Yes, there are
14.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
> We should debate idea's not authors There is a large group of people that is more interested in other people instead of ideas and to evaluate anything they need to check their trust in the person uttering it. I think they simply n
15.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Nobody can be an example of tolerance that has a problem with formal or informal modes of communication. It will never be true or believable.
16.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
That is just enabling some pretty bad actors in my opinion who don't even care about minorities. People that do care tend to be very flexible about language use. Not being tolerant here is a pretty clear sign of close mindedness in rea
17.
by raxxorrax 4y ago
Their arguments are so debased that you can only respond with humor. So I sympathize that some users call her chairman Pao. The screech from Reich is full of contradictions. The truth why someone like Trump can have success is because the t
18.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Discord has the same problem as IRC, although the latter at least might have provides logs. But Discord content is not discoverable because it cannot be crawled. A lot of good info is hidden behind a proprietary wall.
19.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Hm, I disagree that any effect has to be political. If so the word seems to have little intrinsic meaning.
20.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
What makes everything political? Of course something I do or say can influence others, but it is still not political in the vast majority of instances. Not even non-significantly. Political action is shaping my environment to my desire. Via
21.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Not really a fan of exorcism, but it would pose a security risk. The probability it will hit the wrong people is immense to almost certain. Maybe even someone organizing protest within Russia. But random acts against Russian developers is a
22.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Then you better be a well informed person or otherwise you will quickly become the latter.
23.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Worse, he also provides ammunition for Kremlin propaganda. Which already is easier because people don't trust the press. Which is also understandable because some write a lot of bullshit.
24.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Passwords are safe if you can memorize them. It is not too hard in my opinion. I also think they should always be an option for any kind of auth. Maybe I want to authenticate against a system but I don't want others to know my ID. For
25.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Also it is a moving space. Browsers don't accept a single certificate for a site anymore, you also have to have that signed by a CA. You can create such a certificate yourself too, but as of today you will need at least two certificate
26.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
True, in this case it is an exception of course. Although in times of social media an audience is easy to be found. Memes are the opium of the people or something like that.
27.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
You can still self-host and use external resources to manage network and system security. You would keep full control over the machine this way. Having professionals sensibly partitioning different resources in respective subnets is still o
28.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Good explanation by them, maybe because politico is so adapt at propaganda? It is a good argument to evaluate ethical misbehavior but is not at all applicable in a geopolitical context. Credibility is an important currency in journalism or
29.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
It just shows how people have no idea about how transparent they have become. A private guy filming you is so trivial and insignificant compared to surveillance capitalism, it shouldn't even get a mention.
30.
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Western media splattered out propaganda about Russia election interference because it was domestically convenient. Propaganda can only be effective if there is a hint of truth. And with publications like politico it might even be more than

More ›