5 ms·
For context, Plaschke is the senior sports writer for the Los Angeles Times. I have been reading his columns (mainly Dodgers coverage) off and on for at least 2
by jacobkg 6y ago
For context, Plaschke is the senior sports writer for the Los Angeles Times. I have been reading his columns (mainly Dodgers coverage) off and on for at least 20 years. So my subjective experience was that this definitely felt like someone I “knew” as opposed to a random journalist. Also this is the only time I recall him writing about a topic other than sports
This part hit me especially hard as it describes one of my fears:
“I wore a mask everywhere. I followed all the rules, but a couple of weeks ago I didn’t follow my instincts. I briefly let my guard down. The coronavirus came out swinging.”
- adevx 6y agoI believe he may feel it was this slip up, but I highly doubt it. Look at The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden or Norway where practically nobody is using masks. If masks made that much of a difference, we would surely be able to tell.
- seanmcdirmid 6y agoMasks are more effective at protecting other people from your germs, not the other way around. You are at risk if you hang around people who aren’t wearing masks and you put people around you at risk by not wearing.
- rumanator 6y ago> Look at The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden or Norway where practically nobody is using masks. I'm not sure you have a good grasp on what you're talking about. Sweden has one of the highest death rates per capita in Europe,and the absolute worse in nordic countries. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53498133 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53498133 The strategy followed by the Netherlands is to quarantine everyone who does a covid19 test, and get anyone feeling any symptoms to get immediately tested. https://www.government.nl/topics/coronavirus-covid-19/tackling-new-coronavirus-in-the-netherlands/basic-rules-for-everyone https://www.government.nl/topics/coronavirus-covid-19/tackli... More importantly, the strategy followed in the countries you've mentioned was to intentionally let the disease spread in a way that didn't overwhelmed health services. While the rest of Europe is intentionally trying to completely contain the disease, the strategy followed by Sweden consists of letting it spread freely as long as they can claim their health services aren't overtaxed. In my opinion that approach is idiotic because currently the best thing health services can do to a critical covid19 case is linger around while watching the patient die, thus what's the point of bothering about if a health service has enough beds to fill?
- timr 6y ago"Sweden has one of the highest death rates per capita in Europe, and the absolute worse in nordic countries." That is an incredibly misleading way of saying "Sweden is far better than Belgium, the UK and Spain in terms of death rate per 100k, and significantly better than Italy": https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality In fact, Sweden is ~mid pack for first-world countries. You really have to cherry pick the data to make it look bad. Yes, Finland is doing relatively well, but it is also beat out by world-renowned public health stalwarts like Afghanistan and Sudan, so...perhaps other factors are at play.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- rramach 6y agoI don't get this obsession with comparing Sweden, a remote, sparsely-populated country, to more dense, well-connected, large population centers. If you really want to compare Sweden, please restrict your comparisons to its closely similar, equally remote and sparsely populated neighbors, namely, Norway and Finland. The 10X difference between them will be immediately obvious.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- timr 6y agoFinland and Norway have half the population of Sweden. Sweden has about the same population as Belgium, Portugal and Greece...or Georgia (and Ohio, and Michigan, and...) in the US, none of which are places that people are shy about extrapolating from, when it suits their narrative. You may not like the conclusions that can be drawn from Sweden, but you can't dismiss it based on population. Try again.
- adevx 6y agoAs mentioned below one must look at deaths per million to get any meaningful insight from the data per country. I probably should have left Sweden out to prevent you from jumping on that specific case. Anyway, the measures about quarantine you point out or only just in effect and have no bearing on the spread and then decline, without masks as seen from February/March. Looking at how masks are being used (reused, touched) one could argue they do more harm than good. As was the original story from experts.
- jakeva 6y agoI can't imagine what thought process leads from an unsubstantiated claim that practically nobody uses masks in some countries to an assertion that they must not make any difference.
- apexalpha 6y agoFYI masks are now mandatory in all public transport and even some busy outside areas in NL.
- vinni2 6y agoNorway also introduced masks in public transport at least in and around Oslo.
- Wasser 6y agoFirst: USE YOUR MASK. Don't argue about this shit. Researchers will do their job and will TELL YOU if it makes sense or not when the data is out. Its absolutly a no brainer and no issue at all to wear a mask. Its a no brainer on an discussion base as well. And don't bring Sweden in here. They are quite informed and took a lot of precaution and still have bad numbers but nonethless there is probably 10x or 100x less Karens in Sweden then in USA.
- xkbarkar 6y agoThis has really worked in Peru
- dang 6y agoPlease don't use uppercase for emphasis. If you want to emphasize a word or phrase, put asterisks around it and it will get italicized. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Also, please omit flamebait tropes like "Karens". We don't need that here.
- pts_ 6y agoIt's nothing to be afraid of. It's like you don't walk out the door in a spacecraft of a space habitat without a space suit.
- Volundr 6y agoI don't think it's nearly that easy. I find myself constantly struggling with the balance between proper precaution and not completely shutting down my life. Do I invite friends for a nice socially distanced lunch in the park? Maybe or do that quick trip to Home Depot to get supplies for my projects at home. That feels easy to justify, one quick trip and these projects could keep me busy for weeks. But is it easy to justify because I WANT to do it, or because it's actually a good idea. It's always easy to rationalize something you want, and often hard to know your doing it. Sure, my trip to Home Depot is probably fine. I'm probably healthy, and wouldn't pick up anything on the outing, but on the other hand it's optional, and what if I picked up Covid on my last trip to the grocery store, and wind up passing it on to some 70 year old who HAS to go to Home Depot because their toilet broke. It's a hard line to know what is the proper amount of caution. At least for me. Very much unlike walking out a space station airlock, where the proper precaution is very clear.
- tfehring 6y agoThat sentence immediately reminded me of this: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/another-dull-quarantine-weekend-at-home-target-chipotle-home-depot-and-our-nieces-graduation-party https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/another-dull-quarantine-... I wonder what share of cases have been spread by people "letting their guard down."
- fortran77 6y agoIt's interesting to know if people who really are careful and follow the handwashing/mask/distancing rules get sick. It seems like they're much, much less likely to.