3 ms·
What about chaining VPNs? Even at 2 they'd have to cooperate to unmask your traffic, right? Somewhere in the back of my mind is stored that minimaxir does this
by solarkraft 6y ago
What about chaining VPNs? Even at 2 they'd have to cooperate to unmask your traffic, right?
Somewhere in the back of my mind is stored that minimaxir does this, but I couldn't confirm it with a quick search.
Edit: I was actually thinking of mirimir.
- toyg 6y ago>What about chaining VPNs? You could even do it multiple times, like... 7. You would then be, basically, "behind 7 proxies". /s
- amscanne 6y agoProvider#1 only knows all traffic goes to provider#2. Provider#2 knows everywhere your traffic goes. They don’t know your IP, but you need to login, so they know who you are anyways.
- pbhjpbhj 6y agoI think you need 3 levels. First level gets you to the second level. 2nd gets access to web-based email and bitcoin or single-use credit card payment to get the third level, which accesses data. Obviously you use assumed identity. With only two layers you'd need to access emails, say, for account confirmation direct from your own system; with 3 you put a VPN in that gap. Do VPNs re-pack and modify the timing on packages they pass on to clients? It seems like they're need to if they're too avoid coordination attacks. I'm recalling how a research paper showed an extraordinary high number of pages visited (80%) over HTTPS could be identified using page size alone. If a TLA is watching all traffic into and out of a VPN's server can they pair upstream traffic to downstream clients at all?
- progval 6y agoJust make sure the billing info of the outgoing VPN can't be traced back to you if you want anonymity.