4 ms·
> only to configurations that have gotten FAA approval, right? No, the FAA doesn't regulate seating layouts. Weight and balance have to be met, and exit time
by redis_mlc 7y ago
> only to configurations that have gotten FAA approval, right?
No, the FAA doesn't regulate seating layouts.
Weight and balance have to be met, and exit time is verified.
- SilasX 7y agoSo ... only to FAA approved configurations, then, as judged by weight distribution and exit time.
- burnte 7y agoNo, FAA doesn't deal with configurations. They have regs as to how to balance loads, but that's a hot-to rule, not something you need to get approved or they'd have to approve every single flight. Nothing is stopping Southwest from removign all their seats right now.
- SilasX 7y agoSo you're using an arbitrary definition of configuration that makes you correct and everyone else sound ignorant.
- hef19898 7y agoThe thing is, the FAA and ESA are putting targets for evac times. These have to be adhered to. They are not looking at individual configs, just that evac times are kept and properly tested for.
- redis_mlc 7y agoFYI: In case you're not a pilot, I was being a little ironic about weight and balance. Since people are heavier today, and carrying unweighed baggage into the cabin, weight and balance are actually not being met. They're blocking off the last 2 rows on the A320neo because of this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherfarmbrough/2019/09/19/why-airlines-are-losing-weight-on-the-airbus-320neo/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherfarmbrough/2019/09/19/wh... I'm a commercially-rated airplane pilot. I tolerate the pedantic HN comments, but please realize that I know what I'm talking about, and if you're not a pilot, you don't.
- Dylan16807 7y agoIn your mind, if there was only a single rule that seats have to be red, would that count as only allowing "approved configurations"? They have to meet a couple simple measurements, but they can do anything at all inside that constraint, putting seats anywhere they want with nothing stopping them. "approved configurations" just isn't accurate.