4 ms·

> Last time I checked they were still barring members of the CDC from going into China to help asses the situation. I checked and the WHO team led by a Canadia

by oefrha 7y ago

> Last time I checked they were still barring members of the CDC from going into China to help asses the situation. I checked and the WHO team led by a Canadian epidemiologist has been working in China for more than two weeks, since Feb 10. I fail to see why they are obligated to allow in a team from a nation that’s been openly hostile for a long time just because they asked and used the word “help”. Sounds like arrogance to me.

allovernow 7y ago
This is not an event for petty emotions. Also in high likelihood those who are there on behalf of the CDC are keeping quiet in order not to be kicked out. But you bet there's espionage going on. The Chinese government doesn't mess around. And in this case it'd be justified. You're talking about the rest of the world at stake. This is no place for cover-ups and minimization. Transparency is critical.
- oefrha 7y ago
  > This is not an event for petty emotions. If only “openly hostile” was limited to “petty emotions” that can be waved away.
  - ng12 7y ago
    Welcome to international politics. The US and Russia were in the UN together throughout the cold war -- cooperating on some issues while being at odds over others.
  - fastball 7y ago
    If only "openly hostile" was true. "open hostilities" generally means outright war or pretty close to it. Clearly something that has not been very close to happening.
- Johnny555 7y ago
  If the outbreak started in the USA, would you expect the USA to welcome a team of Chinese Government epidemiologists?
  - grandmczeb 7y ago
    I expect they would be allowed. The US also allows international observers for its elections as well.
    - pbhjpbhj 7y ago
      The USA is objectively corrupt from the top, have recently removed themselves from non nuclear proliferation and climate treaties .. as a country the message seems clear that USA don't care two shits about the rest of the World. The idea Trump would open his response to an epidemic up to international inspection is just laughable - and I say his, rather than USA government's because that's how things appear to work there.
      - pimmen 7y ago
        Trump has not even nearly as much power as you seem to think. We hear about his abuses of power because hearing ”California government implements reforms to reduce carbon emissions, in spite of Trump” doesn’t generate as much emotions as his corrupt practices. Imagine a Chinese provincial government openly (key word openly) going against the CCP’s wishes. Or a judge, or a prosecutor.
      - jki275 7y ago
        Please don't use "objectively" as a replacement for "in my opinion". The two are not the same.
        pbhjpbhj 7y ago
        You don't believe that Trump's manipulation of Ukraine, say, is a proven fact? He damn near admitted it himself. Or do you think a president subverting the will of the legislature of their country for personal gain isn't corruption? I wasn't expressing my opinion.
        jki275 7y ago
        This isn't a political discussion forum. You are expressing your political opinion about someone you dislike. You are not expressing fact. Just stop.
- tanilama 7y ago
  Looking at CDC's response so far: 1. Testing only 400 cases across the whole country. 2. Defective test kits which will only be fixed until Mid March 3. Hawaii now asking ask Japan(which by itself is doing a horrible job at handling the situation) for test kits because they have none, and test 0 people so far. Doesn't seem first world to me honestly. Might have South Korea gives them some lessons as how to deal with the pandemic situation. Maybe they are transparent and honest, but I really don't want to understand much more about how little they can do. I am watching the development almost hourly everyday and so far CDC is only giving me more reasons to panic.
  - Symmetry 7y ago
    We had been making due with Lab Developed Tests (LDTs). They work fine but they're only allowed to be used at the lab that developed them and we're going to need tests that can be run at hospitals. The CDC can legally issue emergency tests that can be distributed the way we need to. But for these to be used the FDA had to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). And that couldn't happen until the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) declared this was an emergency. All of which happened. But When the HHS declared an emergency the situation is legally considered to important for LDTs to be used, which would normally be fine. But the original CDC tests had a reagent that was incorrectly manufactured. That's being fixed but last I heard the working testing kits hadn't been distributed yet. This is sort of a huge problem because testing for a particular viral RNA sequence isn't especially hard and it should be within the capability of even a large hospital to develop their own tests, though there is a chance they'd mess up the way the CDC did. Our whole bureaucratic structure in the US isn't set up to deal with a new disease emerging quickly and we really need to fix this.
    - tanilama 7y ago
      Thanks for the information. The slated bureaucracy is eye-opening.
baq 7y ago
the WHO has taken some not entirely transparent actions during handling of this epidemic and there are allegations that it's boss has a conflict of interest (his country apparently takes a lot of investments from China) and also that there are some pandemic-related financial instruments from which certain parties stand to benefit June 2020 if pandemic isn't declared. these are all hearsay but would explain trying to appease China and their choice of words in their press conferences. both are of course consistent with trying to not spread panic and make sure WHO has access to China, so I'm inclined to think that this is half politics, half good high level medicine work.
- oefrha 7y ago
  I would hope that the WHO director’s personal politics doesn’t have a huge sway over WHO’s official stance.
- netsharc 7y ago
  WHO politicking can be explained with other than an (IMO semi-bigoted) "China has a lot of investments in Ethiopia", it's got to do with trying to deal with an authoritarian country that doesn't like losing face. If WHO said something that can be taken as an insult, China can tell them to GTFO, and the WHO would lose first hand experience of what's going on there, which might make things more catastrophic..
thinkingemote 7y ago
Just to make it clear in case readers were unaware: CDC: Center for Disease Control - a US Federal agency. WHO: World Health Organisation - a United Nations organisation.

by oefrha 7y ago

allovernow 7y ago

This is not an event for petty emotions. Also in high likelihood those who are there on behalf of the CDC are keeping quiet in order not to be kicked out. But you bet there's espionage going on. The Chinese government doesn't mess around. And in this case it'd be justified. You're talking about the rest of the world at stake. This is no place for cover-ups and minimization. Transparency is critical.

oefrha 7y ago
> This is not an event for petty emotions. If only “openly hostile” was limited to “petty emotions” that can be waved away.
- ng12 7y ago
  Welcome to international politics. The US and Russia were in the UN together throughout the cold war -- cooperating on some issues while being at odds over others.
- fastball 7y ago
  If only "openly hostile" was true. "open hostilities" generally means outright war or pretty close to it. Clearly something that has not been very close to happening.
Johnny555 7y ago
If the outbreak started in the USA, would you expect the USA to welcome a team of Chinese Government epidemiologists?
- grandmczeb 7y ago
  I expect they would be allowed. The US also allows international observers for its elections as well.
  - pbhjpbhj 7y ago
    The USA is objectively corrupt from the top, have recently removed themselves from non nuclear proliferation and climate treaties .. as a country the message seems clear that USA don't care two shits about the rest of the World. The idea Trump would open his response to an epidemic up to international inspection is just laughable - and I say his, rather than USA government's because that's how things appear to work there.
    - pimmen 7y ago
      Trump has not even nearly as much power as you seem to think. We hear about his abuses of power because hearing ”California government implements reforms to reduce carbon emissions, in spite of Trump” doesn’t generate as much emotions as his corrupt practices. Imagine a Chinese provincial government openly (key word openly) going against the CCP’s wishes. Or a judge, or a prosecutor.
    - jki275 7y ago
      Please don't use "objectively" as a replacement for "in my opinion". The two are not the same.
      - pbhjpbhj 7y ago
        You don't believe that Trump's manipulation of Ukraine, say, is a proven fact? He damn near admitted it himself. Or do you think a president subverting the will of the legislature of their country for personal gain isn't corruption? I wasn't expressing my opinion.
        jki275 7y ago
        This isn't a political discussion forum. You are expressing your political opinion about someone you dislike. You are not expressing fact. Just stop.
tanilama 7y ago
Looking at CDC's response so far: 1. Testing only 400 cases across the whole country. 2. Defective test kits which will only be fixed until Mid March 3. Hawaii now asking ask Japan(which by itself is doing a horrible job at handling the situation) for test kits because they have none, and test 0 people so far. Doesn't seem first world to me honestly. Might have South Korea gives them some lessons as how to deal with the pandemic situation. Maybe they are transparent and honest, but I really don't want to understand much more about how little they can do. I am watching the development almost hourly everyday and so far CDC is only giving me more reasons to panic.
- Symmetry 7y ago
  We had been making due with Lab Developed Tests (LDTs). They work fine but they're only allowed to be used at the lab that developed them and we're going to need tests that can be run at hospitals. The CDC can legally issue emergency tests that can be distributed the way we need to. But for these to be used the FDA had to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). And that couldn't happen until the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) declared this was an emergency. All of which happened. But When the HHS declared an emergency the situation is legally considered to important for LDTs to be used, which would normally be fine. But the original CDC tests had a reagent that was incorrectly manufactured. That's being fixed but last I heard the working testing kits hadn't been distributed yet. This is sort of a huge problem because testing for a particular viral RNA sequence isn't especially hard and it should be within the capability of even a large hospital to develop their own tests, though there is a chance they'd mess up the way the CDC did. Our whole bureaucratic structure in the US isn't set up to deal with a new disease emerging quickly and we really need to fix this.
  - tanilama 7y ago
    Thanks for the information. The slated bureaucracy is eye-opening.

baq 7y ago

the WHO has taken some not entirely transparent actions during handling of this epidemic and there are allegations that it's boss has a conflict of interest (his country apparently takes a lot of investments from China) and also that there are some pandemic-related financial instruments from which certain parties stand to benefit June 2020 if pandemic isn't declared. these are all hearsay but would explain trying to appease China and their choice of words in their press conferences. both are of course consistent with trying to not spread panic and make sure WHO has access to China, so I'm inclined to think that this is half politics, half good high level medicine work.

oefrha 7y ago
I would hope that the WHO director’s personal politics doesn’t have a huge sway over WHO’s official stance.
netsharc 7y ago
WHO politicking can be explained with other than an (IMO semi-bigoted) "China has a lot of investments in Ethiopia", it's got to do with trying to deal with an authoritarian country that doesn't like losing face. If WHO said something that can be taken as an insult, China can tell them to GTFO, and the WHO would lose first hand experience of what's going on there, which might make things more catastrophic..

thinkingemote 7y ago

Just to make it clear in case readers were unaware: CDC: Center for Disease Control - a US Federal agency. WHO: World Health Organisation - a United Nations organisation.