10 ms·
People Who Do Not Exist Invade Facebook
- ProAm 7y agoWhat age demographic still really uses facebook? American's 35+? All my friends us Messenger and the rest is on other social media platforms for content. edit dont know why this got downvoted, it was a legit question because everyone knows who the primary age group of votes is, so Im wondering if there is data on age demographics of actual FB use.
- technofiend 7y ago>American's 35+? You're probably right, but until recently that was also the people most likely to vote. [1] So going after your core demographic who can be found on one site makes sense. You said it yourself: younger people are spread across many different social media platforms. I assume that means reaching them as a whole requires more time, effort and expense than buying ads on Facebook. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/29/gen-z-millennials-and-gen-x-outvoted-older-generations-in-2018-midterms/ https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/29/gen-z-mille...
- shrimp_emoji 7y ago>American's 35+? I.e., the demo majority[0] and the only ones who actually vote. Seems pretty solid. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_United_States#Median_age_of_the_population https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_the_United_State...
- txcwpalpha 7y ago>All my friends us Messenger and the rest is on other social media platforms for content. Be cognizant of your bubble. All of my friends (aka people I actually regularly interact with) don't ever use FB anymore, but a quick glance at my FB feed shows that a huge population of people from my high school (people in their mid-to-late 20s), mostly the ones I haven't interacted with in years, still use it heavily.
- droithomme 7y agoI've got every known facebook domain blocked in my hosts file (basic common sense move for the non-dumb) and can't even verify that sort of thing.
- ProAm 7y agoI agree, that is why I asked the question. Has there been real research done to determine who the most active deep users of the platform are. Im not judging people that do or dont use it, for any reason, just curious about the efficacy of these fake users trying to shape a platform for an election (I assume that is what the fraudulent accounts are for).
- rhino369 7y agoThe ones that vote in high numbers.
- andrewbinstock 7y ago> American's 35+? FB has >1 billion real users. So by the simplest arithmetic, the vast majority of its users cannot be American, regardless of age.
- josteink 7y agoThe context here is affecting American elections. Given that the only interesting FB demographic to discuss is the American one. And I say that as a European.
- droithomme 7y agoWe're including bogus accounts then? Or are we saying that foreign users are more naive and less likely to value privacy? I doubt that that racist supposition is true, but respect your opinion and your forthcoming documentation proving it.
- kraftman 7y agoI have a bunch of events and groups on facebook, what do you use instead of these?
- anigbrowl 7y agoAll my friends us Messenger You mean...Facebook Messenger?
- Animats 7y agoThe same group is on Twitter, and just got kicked off.[1] Fake Messenger accounts are a thing, too, and harder to report.[2] [1] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/475536-facebook-twitter-remove-accounts-tied-to-inauthentic-pro-trump-network https://thehill.com/policy/technology/475536-facebook-twitte... [2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-messenger-user-watch-out-for-fake-messages-rigged-with-malware/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-messenger-user-watch-...
- alistairSH 7y agoI'm 42. Anecdotally, most of my peers at least have an account. Many use FB periodically for checking in with older family. It's also used for events and "meetup" stuff. And the market place (with various local for-sale-or-trade groups) has largely replaced Ebay and craigslist, because access to those groups can be somewhat controlled. Craigslist and Ebay are both a dumpster fire of scammers, low-ballers, and overall shady characters (which is saying a lot when FB is increasingly patrolled by "Russian" bots). Basically, FB was the first massive social network, and so far, nothing better has come along (that has enough membership to entice people away).
- tabtab 7y agoFake people reading and writing fake news on fake websites? If this keeps up, we'll end up with a fake President. Don't give me negative points, for this is a fake reply.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- dilyevsky 7y agoThe world has gone full Philip K Dick
- alexpetralia 7y agoFor those interested in understanding the reference here, I found this useful: https://expressiveegg.org/2017/01/03/four-kinds-dystopia/ https://expressiveegg.org/2017/01/03/four-kinds-dystopia/
- DonHopkins 7y agoIt's Always Sunny in Phildickia.
- saalweachter 7y agoI occasionally think about the end of The Man in the High Castle, when the characters realize they are living in a fictional alternate history.
- boring_twenties 7y agoWTF man? Not everyone has read everything already...
- selestify 7y agoIt’s been out for decades, surely spoilers are expired now by any reasonable time limit
- andrewclunn 7y agounsplash does not require credit be given: "All photos published on Unsplash can be used for free. You can use them for commercial and noncommercial purposes. You do not need to ask permission from or provide credit to the photographer or Unsplash, although it is appreciated when possible. More precisely, Unsplash grants you an irrevocable, nonexclusive, worldwide copyright license to download, copy, modify, distribute, perform, and use photos from Unsplash for free, including for commercial purposes, without permission from or attributing the photographer or Unsplash. This license does not include the right to compile photos from Unsplash to replicate a similar or competing service."
- jeffdavis 7y agoIt will be interesting when the election cycles start to cross over into eachother. For instance, start lining up primaries for an election 5 years away. We could be in a permenent election, with people slowly positioning themselves to be elected sometime later. Then, we can finally give up and just draft our representatives. Two months before it's time for new politicians to take over, they would draw names, and do 6am door-kicking raids to abduct the "candidates" and take them to D.C. to represent us.
- mlpinit 7y agoMultivac to the rescue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_(short_story) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_(short_story)
- leggomylibro 7y ago>We could be in a permenent election, with people slowly positioning themselves to be elected sometime later. Aren't we already there? The current US president held his first 2020 campaign rally on February 18 2017, less than a month after his inauguration: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/us/politics/campaign-over-president-trump-will-hold-a-what-else-campaign-rally.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/us/politics/campaign-over...
- dillondoyle 7y agoI might be misunderstand but politicians have always positioned themselves to be elected sometime later. In fact it seems the opposite is just gaining some steam, first time candidates running for high office as first race, when it used to be slowly going from local to national.
- ajmurmann 7y agoTrump never stopped campaigning as it is. He has been holding rallies this entire time.
- 9HZZRfNlpR 7y agoWho are those people who go to political rallies? This feels so alien to me. Americans support their politicians like the rest of the world their local club and badge and vice versa.
- buttholesurfer 7y agoLmao, already starting on this bullshit narrative for 2020? Face it Americans love trump.
- blakesterz 7y agoThere's another story (I assume of many) over at the NY Times with the headline "Facebook Discovers Fake AI-Generated Profiles". I rather like the "People Who Do Not Exist" in this headline.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- fakegalitarian 7y agoReminder that the Russians primarily targeted black americans to agitate us over police brutality, and that every single media piece that gives more than 3 example ads without showing a single one target black americans is, with high probability (a statistician can formalize this), peddling an agenda. "White working class voters" were never the primary target and they targeted them less as the campaign went on. Primary source: https://intelligence.house.gov/social-media-content/social-media-advertisements.htm https://intelligence.house.gov/social-media-content/social-m...
- buboard 7y agolove how the only facebook comment under the article is a fake "make money from home" bot
- mcadenhe 7y agoIt's poetic really. I bet most of us saw that too but because of the all-too-familiar bot text didn't think twice about it. Kind of like banner blindness. It makes me wonder just how much damage these influence campaigns do. For instance, if Russia spent $100k in FB ads to reach ~140 million people[1](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/04/18/what-the-mueller-report-tells-us-about-russian-influence-operations/ https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/04/18/w...), how much of that "reach" translates into votes? I'd like to think people aren't as dumb as people think.
- bluntfang 7y ago>I'd like to think people aren't as dumb as people think. It's not really about people being smart or dumb. There's evidence that marketing and advertisements create sentiment, even if you don't believe in what the ads say. It's just the way our human brains work. And these entities are, if I had to bet, putting a lot of money towards getting people to believe certain things and act in certain ways without them explicitly knowing that they're being influenced.
- ConsiderCrying 7y agoIf only the political bots were as obvious, though. When you spot one of those "make money easy", you know it's a bot right away, not even two words in. With a political troll, you can't tell unless you know what to look for or can spot a pattern in their behavior.
- avivo 7y agoI actually just published a guide on how you can help ensure that ("deepfake") tools that you make are less likely to end up misused like this: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614912/ethical-deepfake-tools-a-manifesto/ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614912/ethical-deepfake-t... Curious what folks think. I also just posted it to /newest if you want to respond there.
- catalogia 7y agoIs anybody old enough to remember if people once had analogous reactions to software like photoshop?
- hoistbypetard 7y agoWhile I don't recall any specific article like this one published, I do remember people writing about similar worries in the mid '90s.
- michaelbuckbee 7y agoI am (mid-forties) and started using Photoshop around version 2. People definitely worried about the integrity of photographic evidence. I think what's different now is the combination of much more powerful cheaper tools (those fake GAN generated faces are likely taken from one of the sites making them for free) vs Photoshop at the time was thousands of inflation-adjusted dollars. This is coupled with a much more efficient peer to peer and unvalidated news system (which there's much to like), but consider Dan Rather. He was forced out of CBS Evening News and producers were fired for having been fooled by (not producing) digitally forged memos for a story critical of George W. Bush. [1] Contrast that to whatever group is putting up fake stories and accounts of Facebook, there are no repercussions. 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Rather#Killian_documents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Rather#Killian_documents
- btilly 7y agoWhat is even crazier about the Dan Rather story is that the story about how George W. Bush avoided Vietnam due to political manipulation and bribes was actually TRUE. Before it was ever reported in the USA it was reported in the UK by The Guardian among others. Dan Rather's team started their investigation with sources in hand which already constituted very strong evidence. Given that the story was true and Dan Rather's team was starting with solid evidence of it, Bush's team was at a disadvantage in discrediting the story. Their solution was to slip a clearly faked smoking gun that was so good that Rather would have to lead with it. After Rather lead with it, Bush's team was able to discredit Rather and get him fired. The result was that the story became toxic and nobody in the USA was willing to report the story. The result is rather amazing. By faking evidence for what really did happen, Bush's team was able to make everyone believe that it didn't happen! And was able to keep the story out of the US media!
- fareesh 7y agoOn Facebook you would mostly encounter such people if someone you know shares their posts. Comments are buried too deep to have a widespread impact. If a fake person writes the post and your friend shares it, or a guy named "Joe the Plumber" writes it, does it really make a difference? It is also in the realm of possibility that a group of folks is "false flagging" these profiles to make the other side look disingenuous and shady.
- creaghpatr 7y agoSure, in fact there’s a term for that called Ratfucking.
- sillysaurusx 7y ago... what?
- catalogia 7y agoIt's a real term in American politics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking
- sillysaurusx 7y agoThanks! Now I've seen everything. (It's official; with that one link, that was the everything.)
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- sjwright 7y agoIt doesn’t matter how autonomous and free thinking you are or any other individual is— social media is transforming us into a collective. Like ants excreting pheromones, our actions in aggregate are more powerful than any individual, the result being whatever results from this untested cocktail of biology, language and global connection. It’s unprecedented and borderline unpredictable. Nobody is in a position to directly manipulate our path... but our trajectory, if nudged in the right place and time, can have massive consequences in the future. Both the left and the right in the US are dysfunctional as a result of trajectories that were nudged decades ago.
- onlyrealcuzzo 7y agoHow is this worse than tightly controlled mass media? I think people like to look back on this non-existent golden era of News where it was fair and balanced and just reported the truth. That era never existed. At least now you have options. I hate social media as much as anyone, but it's not bringing an end to the world. It's easy to manipulate people of Facebook. But it's way easier on Fox News or CNN.
- pjc50 7y agoI think they're actually feeding off one another. e.g. recent controversy: > In December 2019, Newton Dunn wrote an article for The Sun titled "'HIJACKED LABOUR'", in which he reported that former British intelligence officers alleged that "Jeremy Corbyn is at the centre of an extraordinary network of hard-left extremists."[10] It was later found that the ultimate sources for the claim included the antisemitic, far-right websites the Millennium Report and Aryan Unity... The article was deleted on the day of publication, without comment from the paper or Newton Dunn. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Newton_Dunn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Newton_Dunn ; I believe this has already been through the wikipedia controversy process)
- zo1 7y agoYou have options but you are being manipulated in subtle ways, whether nefariously or not. And that "manipulation" is a whole lot more hidden due to simply being "algorithms". On some level it is getting a free-pass compared to traditional media where you can clearly see the bias.
- 3fe9a03ccd14ca5 7y agoI love the “X influenced the election... because the outcome was not what I wanted” meme of 2016. And 2018. And 2020?
- droithomme 7y agoAll Trump supporters Russian robots. No one support evil Trump. KEK KEK. No wait. Fake news fake news. Trump bad orange man. Algorithms prove it. Hillary was elected President. There was a coup. Nothing about this news is false flag. Definitely legit. KEK KEK comrades. Red blooded american speaking here for sure. No way evil Russian agent!
- gesman 7y agoWill there be pre-impeached president, just to skip formalities? Losing party will have free impeachment kit with choice to pick a country that interfered with elections.
- droithomme 7y agoExcellent. No one who isn't worthy of impeachment is qualified to be President.
- xrd 7y agoHere are the assumptions I have about what's happening here. But, the real question I have is: are these thoughts which have been influenced/crafted unbeknownst to me? Pro tip where I attempt to bring awareness to my thoughts: look for the keyword "automatically" in my statements below. 1. These are pro-Trump sites. Perhaps the author filtered only these groups for their results? The takeaway is that I automatically think pro-Trump groups must be creating these fake accounts. Then, I automatically think "Russians!" 2. There is another article from the NYTimes on Hacker News right now (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21847051 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21847051). It mentions a pro Falun Gong group behind it. I automatically think this must be a Chinese state funded group doing it to discredit Falun Gong. This is an amazing bit of research and write up. And, could it be that not everything is what it seems here? I recently heard a discussion from Ben Freeman on Terry Gross' Fresh Air (https://www.npr.org/2019/11/21/781579229/ukrainian-oligarchs-and-the-influence-of-foreign-money-on-american-politics https://www.npr.org/2019/11/21/781579229/ukrainian-oligarchs...). Mr. Freeman is the director of the "Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative at the Center for International Policy." His point was that Russia is actually pretty bad at interference, which is why we know about it. Everyone does it, and the Saudi's and Israel and Japan do it with much more class and craft. It makes me wonder whether these fake accounts come from who we think they do.
- m0zg 7y agoIt'll be fun to see the DNC and the democratic nominee's campaign employ armies of paid shills like they did last time (Correct The Record, Share Blue, etc), after they spent 3+ years railing against the practice. :-)
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoA FB ToS violation is not a violation of the law. Nothing prevents people from having multiple accounts to shill with. The only thing "wrong" is how much people will trust what they read on the internet from random people they don't know.
- rexpop 7y agoWhat, then, ought people to trust?
- jinpan 7y agoTo blend in with humans, these fake profiles could take advantages of AI progress on the Turing test to converse with real people, ultimately befriending (some high fraction of) us. The persuasive effects of these fake friends on (political) advertising are terrifying.
- kpennell 7y agoI have a couple fake profiles I setup. Pretty easy to do!
- fhkatari 7y agoI was forwarded Sacha Baron Cohen's facebook critique (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/22/sacha-baron-cohen-facebook-propaganda https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/22/sacha-bar...) by a friend, as an argument to outlaw facebook. I brought up how Bush swiftboated Kerry and won the election. Media has always been used as a political weapon, it seems. Is FB much worse?
- yters 7y agoHow can we know anyone online is real?
- digi59404 7y agoDid anyone stop and consider these aren’t fake people but people who value anonymity? I have 20 friends who use such tools and tech to hide their identities. Yes they lean right, slightly but they do. They all do this to avoid being found by employers and other. One of my friends is a prominent person in a legal field, another one is a member of a three letter group. Other than my real name - My Facebook profile has all fake information for public facing as well. It always has - and it always will. Any AI viewing my profile or person viewing my profile has no means of identifying me as a real person unless they coorelate my name elsewhere. For many of my friends - Their real name is not used. In an era of fake news and “ZOMG RUSSIA” we’ve become our worst selves and thrown logic out the window instead falling victim to knee jerk reactions.
- elliekelly 7y agoSurely that scenario is the exception and not the rule. But also, if you have the Facebook app on your phone, or associated with your phone number or email, you’re not anonymous. It’s been an issue for sex workers in the past who try to conceal their identity on social media but Facebook still manages to suggest their “Johns” as friends.
- jonfw 7y agoPeople are seeking anonymity from their peers and their employers, not neccesarily from facebook itself. I haven't heard of facebook Doxxing people with any sort of regularity.
- digi59404 7y agoThis isn’t true. I have Facebook on my phone and there’s no way to identify me by my phone number. It’s unlisted on my profile and not public. Searching for me by number or email does not work. I’ve check my Fb privacy settings quite often and try to find workarounds.
- ddmma 7y agoIf you upload contacts in Wazzup you’ll see them suggested into your facebook
- Mugwort 7y agoWWF is all fake. Why not the WWW?
- Mugwort 7y agoIs anyone out there simply unaware of the "fake news" phenomenon. Are we so inured that we cannot differentiate BS from the real thing and need to be protected? I don't think so. Everyone KNOWS. People aren't that stupid. Why wasn't lying us into the Iraq war considered fake news?
- Mugwort 7y agoIs Hacker News fake news? Many times people post things that would make a real expert roll their eyes. There are some smart people here but also lots of inaccurate information.
- mmagic 7y agoFor those interested in how small differences in data lead to large outcomes check this out: https://bit.ly/35mtZZj https://bit.ly/35mtZZj It is a download link for an installation wizard for an advanced computer optimization tool. VictoR works by parsing file storage size through a neural net and then tweaking minor settings which leads to faster computer speeds.
- schnevets 7y agoFacebook won the social media war by cultivating a smaller, more selective group of users (college students). It meant sharing had some more definitive meaning, and provided some added safety for marketplace and message board functions. It was their secret weapon against the MySpaces and CraigsLists, and yet they completely abandoned it. If they really wanted to further their company mission, their Manhattan Project should have been a plan to keep the internet authentic and "owned" by humans. I no longer think this will be their downfall (it has been a problem in the system since at least 2012), but I cannot think of a more stark example of a company trashing an original philosophy so wholeheartedly.
- loceng 7y agoIt wasn't Mark's original philosophy - it was a stolen mechanism that the twins who hired him to develop ConnectU had come up with, so unsurprising that it wouldn't be kept as a cornerstone.
- knzhou 7y agoThat is a catch-22, isn't it? The common definition of "winning the social media war" is to get a lot of users. That is inherently contradictory to "cultivating" a "selective group". Just as water flows downhill, there will inevitably be a few most popular social networks, which will inevitably be driven by clickbait and moral panic and targeted by all bad actors. I already saw that happen with atheism. When I was young you had to be pretty far from normal to be really into it, and there was some fantasy that once everybody was an athiest, society would be cool and rational. Now about a hundred million Americans are effectively athiests and we're no more rational than before. The problems stayed the same, because people stayed the same.
- mistersquid 7y ago> Now about a hundred million Americans are effectively athiests and we're no more rational than before. The US has approximately 330 million people. Asserting more than 1/3 of all adults (330 million includes children) in the US are atheist is a bold and, in your comment, unsubstantiated claim.
- ydb 7y agoThis is nothing new. Influencing elections is a part of having elections -- this liberal idea that "bots" are somehow poisoning the electoral process is beyond out of touch. The TV you watch, whether it's CNN or FOX or MSNBC or CNBC has more of an outsize effect on how you develop your personal beliefs than any of this nonsense. The biggest thing to come out of America's Second Red Scare is that people are more likely to listen to others when they spout propaganda that they already believe. To think it's the FSB or GRU is somehow responsible for a defect in the design of elections in a democratic republic is laughable. If anything, the "Russians" are doing what Siberia and their rough country taught them: make the best of a bad situation.
- rvz 7y agoI'd like to remind everyone that as we are fast approaching the prospect of hundreds of thousands of AIs and bots graduating from their Turing Tests, we must take the internet's own proverb very seriously. Do not believe everything you see on the internet.
- incantations 7y agoSame thing happens when mexico sends its tens of millions of illegal colonizers except in that case its even more direct and on an even larger scale. Then again, being against foreign collusion would make me WACIST.
- didericis 7y agoThe worst thing about widespread fake information is the ease with which you can convince yourself that everything you don't like is fake. We don't really have a defense against it that allows for people with opposing perspectives to coexist. I wonder if it's possible to somehow create a "consistency checker" that can check to see what claims are compatible with what other claims. Not a truth checker; that's far too dangerous and easily abused. But a system that just checks for consistency, combined with a "web of trust" where you can see the connections to people with different perspectives who you know are NOT liars/can connect to events you KNOW are true. That might help people trust information from outside of their comfort zone and identify problems with their own outlook. There's precedent for that kind of a thing in the math world. MetaMath is an example of a system that verifies proofs based on substitution rules alone, plus whatever axioms you add to the system. Natural language news stories that need to correspond to reality are obviously a much different beast, and maybe it's impossible to do something equivalent with knowledge that isn't as rigid/formal as math, but it's tempting to try. Could easily backfire and make the problem worse if done improperly, though. The risk is that such a system could be taken over/hijacked my ideologically motivated individuals to reinforce their own ideas and hide inconsistencies rather than shine a light on them.
- jacobwilliamroy 7y agoMy solution is to just hang out in meatspace, and assume everything I can't physically observe doesn't exist. This has been a surprisingly effective solution.
- creato 7y agoThis seems like it is how (non-ironic) flat earthers come to be.
- jdance 7y agoThe motions of the sun and seasons (my personal experience) are much easier explained by the "round" model :) The truth from ground level is more like "I can't actually know if it's round or not, because the scale is invisible from here". I readily admin I have not seen a round earth and can't say that I know for sure (in the end not even my own memory can be trusted, so I can never really know). But even with that the flat model is really horrible. My point being, I'm sure theres some more weird psychological phenomena that makes people want to believe in a flat earth, rather then hanging out in meat space.
- josephjrobison 7y agoJust a few paragraphs in, the writer incorrectly states that Unsplash requires attribution, which is the exact opposite of the entire premise of Unsplash. If the writer can’t pick up on that obvious fact, makes me trust the whole story less.
- RickJWagner 7y agoIn somewhat-related news, a group of Washington Post reporters tweeted a party photo labeled 'Merry Impeachmas'. There is no impartial source of media today. Not traditional media, not social media. You have to go out and talk to people around you to know what people really think. "If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed, if you do read it, you’re misinformed." - Denzel Washington
- dzhiurgis 7y agoIronically, zuc's new photo looks like it's been generated: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10111007623865331&set=a.743613136151&type=3&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10111007623865331&se... Catching faces from thispersondoesnotexist is easy - just poll the their site every 1 second and collect all faces. Others are probably trickier but FB is sophisticated enough. My real question is how can one specify Z vector that generates a specific (say myself's) face? http://podgorskiy.com/static/stylegan/stylegan.html#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 http://podgorskiy.com/static/stylegan/stylegan.html#wMUUPtHj...