6 ms·
So wait, "we shipped a bug, so we made a browser extension that lets you circumvent the bug". That's cloudflare's answer? I'm not impressed. EDIT: people seem
by skrebbel 7y ago
So wait, "we shipped a bug, so we made a browser extension that lets you circumvent the bug". That's cloudflare's answer? I'm not impressed.
EDIT: people seem to be confused as to what bug cloudflare shipped. The bug is not having people solve captchas because their IP has a bad reputation. It's having them solve it over and over again.
You can put it however you want it, but if my app's UX is fine without cloudflare and it's shit with cloudflare, for a small but significant percentage of my users, then CF has a bug.
- unityByFreedom 7y agoIf captchas are a bug, try running your own popular web service, and good luck keeping away the spam. An extension is easy to install and is a reasonable way for the CDN to verify that you're not a spammer without requiring you to repeatedly prove it whenever your IP changes.
- cnst 7y agoYour comment would make perfect if this whole captcha thing was required in order to post comments. But they require it for static-like content that any decent site should be serving from cache.
- sjwright 7y agoThwarting denial of service attacks isn’t a bug. You seem to be confused about what your rights are around website availability. Hint: you have no rights. Absent specific coercion by government, the owner of the website had all the rights. If she wants to require you to solve a Where’s Waldo first, that’s her prerogative. Your choice is to accept the terms or go elsewhere.
- therealmarv 7y agoIt's discrimination by country/region. It's like saying: oh, you are from Africa or Asia. The chance is higher you are a criminal, so do this test first.
- cnst 7y agoAnd the problem is worse because, apparently, even solving the captchas repeatedly from a given IP address doesn't make it whitelisted, either. So, it fits the very definition of discrimination against a whole wider group, where the individual actions of any individual actors don't matter.
- Thorrez 7y ago>1.The IP address you are on has shown problematic activity online recently in one of our data sources. If you would like to look your IP up, then please look your IP up at Project Honeypot. If the IP address shows data for malicious activity, you can see why there. You can also attempt to whitelist your IP directly on that page by connecting from that IP. If no bad activity is seen from the IP address after a two-week period, then the challenge behavior will stop against that IP address. https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/203366080-Why-do-I-see-a-captcha-or-challenge-page-Attention-Required-trying-to-visit-a-site-protected-by-CloudFlare-as-a-site-visitor- https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/203366080-W...
- dfcowell 7y agoI’ve lived in Vietnam for the past 5 years and experienced these issues first hand. I’m also part of the team responsible for maintaining a relatively aggressive set of Cloudflare WAF rules at my current employer. In these developing countries, great swathes of users are accessing the internet behind carrier-grade NAT. This makes it increasingly likely that any individual user is sharing a public-facing IP with one or more bad actors. In my experience, I’ve never had to solve more than one CAPTCHA per domain, and frankly clicking a checkbox isn’t that hard. As far as discrimination goes, this is a much friendlier solution than just immediately rejecting connection requests from certain CIDRs, which is what would otherwise be happening.
- yjftsjthsd-h 7y ago> In my experience, I’ve never had to solve more than one CAPTCHA per domain, and frankly clicking a checkbox isn’t that hard. If it were that easy, there would be little complaint; the complaints seem to be that people get stuck on capchas indefinitely.
- GetOutOfBed 7y agoAre you saying that OP is trying to do denial of service attacks? Stopping random users from accessing web sites isn't thwarting a DOS attack. If they classify random users as part of some bot net, it sounds like their algorithms are buggy.
- sseveran 7y agoI completely agree the website owner has the right to run whatever they want, so thanks for saying that as its something that too often gets overlooked. At this point I basically refuse to use things with recaptcha or the stupid little cloud flare dots. I just close the tab and move on. I am just so tired of little dots, storefronts, cars, etc...
- lilyball 7y agoYou calling this a "bug" makes it sound like you expect Cloudflare to violate your privacy by tracking which websites you've visited in order to determine that you're not a threat. It sounds like the point of Privacy Pass is the only information it gives Cloudflare is that you've solved a Captcha recently but otherwise provides no information about where you did it (beyond the fact that it's a Cloudflare property). Given the fact that they've resorted to providing an extension to do this, this suggests that they've deliberately engineered their services to not have access to that data internally, and that's a good thing.