6 ms·
The article mentions that WARP is exposing the end user's IP to websites they visit. I'd be interested in how they do that, especially with HTTPS websites where
by eis 7y ago
The article mentions that WARP is exposing the end user's IP to websites they visit. I'd be interested in how they do that, especially with HTTPS websites where they can't MITM and inject headers.
> WARP is not designed to allow you to access geo-restricted content when you’re traveling. It will not hide your IP address from the websites you visit.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- aasdasdasdasd 7y agoThe requests come from a CloudFlare address range -- my original IP isn't visible to the server. Not sure what they mean either.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- xuki 7y agoIt passes on your IP address if the website you're visiting is using CF. See for yourself: https://icanhazip.com https://icanhazip.com - on CF network https://ifconfig.me https://ifconfig.me - not on CF network
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- zackbloom 7y agoGreat eye! We haven't figured out how to expose them yet for sites not using Cloudflare. We do have some experience solving this problem for Spectrum [1] we're hoping to lean on. The most important thing to us is users don't expect us to keep their IP private, as that is not the intent of WARP. 1- https://blog.cloudflare.com/mmproxy-creative-way-of-preserving-client-ips-in-spectrum/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/mmproxy-creative-way-of-preservi...
- fnordsensei 7y agoAre you going out of your way to forward the original IP to the end recipient? What's the point of that? Is it to support IP authenticated logins or similar?
- r1ch 7y agoMost likely so the receivers of abusive traffic can contact the original ISP rather than Cloudflare having to deal with abuse reports.
- basch 7y agoanalytics.
- dgudkov 7y agoFor instance, to play nicely with IP whitelisting in firewalls as an additional security measure.
- e12e 7y agoNot step on the toes of Netflix, Amazon Prime and other services that rely on geo location for enforcing licensing of content / geo-location based artificial scarcity of digital goods?
- fjni 7y agoI'd like an answer to this also! It sounds like cloudflare spent the time to do away with hiding ip addresses. Actively removing that feature of a VPN, which you should get for free in a wireguard implementation, seems fishy to say the least. Especially since no reasonable explanation for this was given.
- fro0116 7y agoFrom the deafening silence I'm going to take the less charitable interpretation that it's meant to enable Cloudflare to essentially sell Warp users' IPs to Cloudflare customers as an added perk.
- Iwillgetby 7y agoThis split tunneling article may be useful. https://www.macobserver.com/news/tmo-scoop/cloudflare-warp-split-tunneling/ https://www.macobserver.com/news/tmo-scoop/cloudflare-warp-s...
- mobilio 7y agoI can confirm. Last night i was testing it and geo-location was visible...
- bithavoc 7y agoWarp doesn't provide anonymity, however, for some reason Netflix in my phone can stream US TV shows with Warp on while my non warped devices can not even list the show. Weird.
- xeroaura 7y agoIt seems to not be hiding IP, but it does inadvertently(?) do so for some site's detection methods I think. When I did an IP lookup, some sites reported correct while others reported one I didn't recognize (assumed its the one from WARP).
- judge2020 7y agoYa it only forwards the IP for websites behind CF for now https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21070828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21070828
- PentiumBug 7y agoBecause Netflix is not a Cloudflare client, so CF can't pass the source (client) IP. The same should happen with Google, Facebook (or anyone not behind CF infrastructure). At least, that's the way I'm currently understanding it.