dgudkov

4 ms·

1.
by dgudkov 10d ago
Off-topic: what a well designed infographics. Clean, easy to read, great layout. A very good job!
2.
by dgudkov 11d ago
> the result will be vastly different from the chart you got the first time. AI can generate reusable artifacts including definitions of the data sources, why not? Most BI dashboards are just XML or JSON (or YAML) files and include def
3.
by dgudkov 11d ago
It's neat but pretends to be more innovative than it actually is. BI has already been decoupled from everything else. People use AI to generate Excel and Power BI reports. YAML/XML/JSON - that doesn't matter. AI can gene
4.
by dgudkov 13d ago
> The fundamental problem is simpler: no one will slow down because no one trusts anyone else to slow down. There is another reason: greed. With that much money invested into AI (including policymakers), nobody will slow down or vote for
5.
by dgudkov 16d ago
A smart but wrong path to solve the problem. We need competitive markets that would force corporations be responsible instead of an extra layer of complexity in the already complex consumer world. I applaud to the author for creativity and
6.
by dgudkov 27d ago
This reads almost like a nuclear incident of the "Three Mile Island" scale. Not "Chernobyl" scale though.
7.
by dgudkov 1mo ago
> Place sounds like a total mess. What big corp is not a total mess?
8.
by dgudkov 1mo ago
> Startups succeed or fail based on how much customers like the product. This is in theory. In practice, a worse product with more money and louder marketing easily wins against a better product nobody knows about. I'm sure Paul per
9.
by dgudkov 1mo ago
Australian beef is of worse quality. It should be cheaper. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/australian-beef-...
10.
Size and Lifespan(xkcd.com)
5 points by dgudkov 1mo ago|0 comments
11.
by dgudkov 2mo ago
It looks like Europe no longer hates Elon. That didn't last long.
12.
by dgudkov 2mo ago
While the article doesn't talk much about it, but the math in it implies that most of the wealth will be transferred to the government in the form of inheritance taxes. So yes, the great wealth transfer. Just not in the direction every
13.
by dgudkov 2mo ago
The question remains without your implication.
14.
by dgudkov 2mo ago
What makes you think the same can't happen with Porkbun?
15.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
How about banning the most deceptive practice that is advertising prices without taxes?
16.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
Wait, not being able to make a picture of yourself is pretty draconian ? In this case, the world before smartphones was a living Hell on Earth.
17.
What does a 13-year-old see on Snapchat in a normal week?(afterbabel.com)
62 points by dgudkov 3mo ago|18 comments
18.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
> And jet engines do not have any lower-tier market with underserved demand They actually do. The segment of small jet-powered (military) drones is rapidly growing and isn't served by the big jet engine manufacturers.
19.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
Good point. I've found their website: https://www.x402.org/
20.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
We need standards and protocols, not another megacorp inserting itself between people. Micropayments should be part of the HTTP protocol.
21.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
Arguing without a common goal (objective) is always about personal beliefs (subjective).
22.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
It develops itself once you drink wine frequently enough.
23.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
It's not laziness. It's a shift of burden (bullshit checks) to the consumer. That burden is not trivial. It takes time and energy, so it's much better for the society when people don't have to do it often. LLMs (will) in
24.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
https://xkcd.com/1053/
25.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
Benefits of being a billionaire are vastly overstated. To live a happy life, you don't need to be a billionaire.
26.
by dgudkov 3mo ago
Never use animation just for the sake of it. This article would not have existed had software designers stuck to this rule. All examples in the article use completely unnecessary animation.
27.
by dgudkov 4mo ago
"We collect everyone's data without paying a dime or respecting copyright, trained our models, but you can't train your models on our models that are trained on everyone's data collected without paying a dime or respecti
28.
by dgudkov 4mo ago
Refuse. Reject. Rebel.
29.
by dgudkov 4mo ago
It's refreshing to see people doing something conceptually interesting outside of the LLM domain.
30.
by dgudkov 4mo ago
I don't see any problem with refunding the massive AI expenses. All the AI costs will be pushed down on consumers whether they need AI or not. Nobody will ask them. Everybody is so deeply hooked on SaaS and cloud and LLM providers that

More ›