29 ms·
Nope. >Mr. Mullenweg said his company intends to maintain the existing policy that bans adult content. He said he has long been a Tumblr user and sees the site
by knd775 7y ago
Nope.
>Mr. Mullenweg said his company intends to maintain the existing policy that bans adult content. He said he has long been a Tumblr user and sees the site as complementary to WordPress.com. “It’s just fun,” he said of Tumblr. “We’re not going to change any of that.”
- xwdv 7y agoSo basically an exercise in blowing several million dollars.
- arkitaip 7y agoWhy do you think that hosting porn for random people will make Automattic money?
- xxpor 7y agoBecause it drives multiples of traffic?
- dageshi 7y agoWhich is mostly unmonetisable by anyone other than advertising more porn. So it's not worth that much?
- marcinzm 7y agoExcept from what everyone is saying and the drop in traffic people are observing it drove multiples of SFW traffic. The porn kept and drove users but they also viewed plenty of SFW content as well. You can monetize the SFW side of things.
- chipotle_coyote 7y agoAs far as I know, Tumblr has never come close to being a sustainable, profitable business; it survived on VC funding until it was bought by Yahoo.
- ng12 7y agoIt's certainly more likely than a site with no users.
- tptacek 7y agoIt's funny the stuff HN fixates on. If all you read is this comment thread, you might actually believe that non-porn Tumblr really is just "an exercise in blowing several million dollars", rather than a concern for a very loud, probably rather small subset of Tumblr users (or rather: former users). What seems at least as likely as "adult content is vital to the future of Tumblr" is that adult content has much more valence in an HN discussion thread, since people have opinions about adult content and not so many opinions about the overwhelming majority of Tumblr content that isn't suppressed. So it takes on an importance on HN that it doesn't have elsewhere, simply because of the fundamental dynamics of message boards ("controversy is always important").
- chx 7y agoIn your opinion what value tumblr has without the adult content (and the communities around them)?
- yeaaaaaaah 7y agoWell sharing adult content was the only thing I used Tumblr for so the adult content ban was why I left.
- gnicholas 7y ago> a very loud, probably rather small subset of Tumblr users (or rather: former users) Well, according to this chart (which I have only cursorily vetted), it seems there are a lot of "former users": https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/af9rwu/oc_a_year_of_tumblr_activity_before_and_after_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/af9rwu/oc_... It shows that as of Jan, 2019, there were about 50% as many users as when the ban was announced. That would suggest that there are as many "former users" as there are current users. And the downward trend has probably continued in the subsequent 6 months.
- tptacek 7y agoThe assumption that Tumblr's loss of users is entirely or even mostly due to suppressing adult content is probably unwarranted, but I'd be interested in data either way.
- dannyw 7y agoYou’re gonna waste your money, Automattic.
- checktheorder 7y ago>“It’s just fun,” he said of Tumblr. “We’re not going to change any of that.” English translation: "We are hell-bent on making sure not to steal bdsmlr's thunder and maintain tumblr's death-spiral."
- stefan_ 7y agoI think the English translation is just ???. That sentence is just the purest nonsense filler.
- ethbro 7y agoThat choice boggles the mind. If you're worried about cross-links between non-adult and adult content tarnishing the platform, add better features for user flagging. They (before the Yahoo and Verizon cluster&#-1s) were essentially sitting on a gold mine of training data, and ongoing training data generation, for an industry-leading porn detection engine. A subscription filtering product that would be worth $$$. Throwing that away because of some overly prudish concept of brand identity is hilarious.
- chatmasta 7y agoI'm sure there is plenty of training data available elsewhere on the internet...
- ethbro 7y agoContinually tagged by ~100M unique monthly visitors? (the rough drop in traffic, post-ban)
- mevile 7y ago> That choice boggles the mind. Serving ads is hard when there's porn on the site.
- IshKebab 7y agoUse a different domain then?
- CamperBob2 7y agoSo much for "a lot of autonomy," then.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- pilsetnieks 7y agoIt doesn't mean it's going to be like that forever. Maybe they're just saying that for the time being until the deal goes through, and afterwards when they've actually familiar with the product and know what it takes to properly implement adult content handling for Tumblr. Automattic isn't that large of a company, and it could take some time and effort to implement proper content moderation features, assign and train people, etc. Either way, even if they leave everything as is, there is no way they are going to be worse stewards of the thing as Verizon or Yahoo were.
- alexis_fr 7y ago> Automattic isn’t a large company > Either way, even if they leave everything as is Which is their plan for the moment. Which worries me about the sanity of Automattic. When you’ve stopped growing long ago and you start buying ventures to keep the turnover going, you end up like this big company which was buying ventures to stay afloat. What was it again? Ah, Yahoo.
- classics2 7y agoThen it’s a corpse.
- loceng 7y agoYup - so will die sooner than later once an adequate alternative exists. Shaming sex and sexuality via policy has no place in a reasonable, civilized, accepting - healthy society.