4 ms·
> that encourage more walkable cities and greener commutes People using a bike that lasts 20 year is much greener than a shared scooter that dies after 100 da
by thatfrenchguy 7y ago
> that encourage more walkable cities and greener commutes
People using a bike that lasts 20 year is much greener than a shared scooter that dies after 100 days of use.
Having more walkable communities start with removing cars from the streets, adding density, by planning our cities. There is no magic tech that will fix the status quo.
- kennywinker 7y agoYou have to compare a scooter being used 24/7 as a rental with a bike being used similarly. Pretty sure docked or dockless ride share bikes need a lot of maintenance too.
- jimmaswell 7y agoHaving to exert yourself so much all day isn't an option for everyone
- ngngngng 7y agoBut it would be an option for more people if they had to do it every day.
- jonnycomputer 7y agoI bike to work, so a little sweat, I'm okay with. But, say, I needed to do a round-trip mile down on a warm afternoon in my work-clothes, biking is not really a viable option. But an e-scooter is, one that is competitive in price to a cab or uber, and without the parking hassle of driving your own car.
- yholio 7y agoEarly bikes probably had similar reliability problems. Once the scooter design stabilizes, we will see refurbished units and mass recycling of consumables. There is nothing inherently wasteful or prone to rapid breakdown in scooters; the fact that there is economic reason to dump them after 100 days only points out how inefficient is everything else and how improperly we tax environmental damage.
- Retric 7y agoThey are prone to break down as complex machines dumped in random locations out in the weather. Scooters can last for years if kept inside and well cared for.
- Scoundreller 7y agoRight, but this is about shared scooters without any of that.
- baybal2 7y agoThe point more about a shared vehicle being more wasteful than a privately owned one: Bikesharing in China resulted in many times more bikes being produced than ones owned privately. Even insurance and license demanding schemes like LiuBike (they rent electric 50cc equivalents) ran into that, despite their vehicles not being as "disposable" as flopped Mobike.
- gibolt 7y agoTime of life isn't important, duration and ridden distance are. If a bike you have for 20 years only moves you 100 miles (probably less for most bike owners due to low utilizatio ) but a shared scooter can make it ~500 miles in 100 days, the scooter is better.
- paulddraper 7y agoYou're correct, but 5 miles/yr is a rather low average, no? That's a single commute.
- gibolt 7y agoBikes are much better in general, especially electric. However, if we are comparing to usage today, a tiny tiny fraction of bike owners commute. Most adults will probably take it out for a ride less than 10 times a year, and for a super short rides. I don't have any stats, just based on observations. I am all for shared micromobility everywhere. Would love to see a healthy mix of scooters, bikes, and mopeds on nearly every corner (in dedicated converted car parking spaces)
- seanmcdirmid 7y agoHowever, somebody who is commuting daily on their bike is replacing it and/or most of its components a lot more often than once every 20 years.
- tapland 7y agoD: I rode my bike 7400 miles the first year owning it, (12 km single way commute and using it for going everywhere else as well). 100 miles is just two weeks of a 5 mile commute =/
- gibolt 7y agoI'm considering the average American adult bicycle owner. You would very much be the exception. Biking is generally considered a leisure activity, not for commuting. Everyone should be like you, but the infrastructure doesn't support it yet in most cities. Safety in a fully A -> B network is required. Driving more micromobility traffic will cause infrastructure changes in the long run