3 ms·
That was Apple's argument in their case against Qualcomm's licensing costs. I always thought that was a weak stance. An iPhone without calls is just an iPod t
by go_prodev 8y ago
That was Apple's argument in their case against Qualcomm's licensing costs.
I always thought that was a weak stance.
An iPhone without calls is just an iPod touch, which clearly doesn't have the appeal of an iPhone.
- bfred_it 8y agoI call about 2 hours a week and still manage to use my phone more than 20 hours a week. Is calling still the primary function of my "phone"? We just call it phone because that's what we attached a computer to, but it's more like a pocket computer with LTE modem for most people. I'd call it Pocket PC if I could!
- kalleboo 8y agoIn many countries they're just called "mobiles" or something to that effect in the local language. Originally short for "mobile phone" but it shortens down nicely generic.
- toast0 8y agoMicrosoft's trademark on Pocket PC is most likely dead, as it hasn't been seen in commerce in a long time, so you can probably call whatever you like a Pocket PC
- Roedou 8y agoExcept the Touch didn't have a data connection. 'Voice calls' isn't the killer feature of a contemporary smart phone, an always-on internet connection is.
- zapzupnz 8y agoIndeed. If iPod touches had cellular radios in them, I wouldn't need an iPhone — but then they'd probably also cost the same, so I'd just get an iPhone anyway.
- copperx 8y agoIs a celular radio really $400 or so? Or why is there such a different pricing scheme?
- zapzupnz 8y agoThe iPod touches also have lower-quality displays, lower-capacity batteries, base units have less storage capacity, usually have older or slightly underpowered A chips, and lower-quality materials leading to a slightly inferior build quality compared to iPhone. (Also, iPod touch hasn't been updated for three years)
- copperx 8y agoThat is true today, but when back when the iPhone was released they were almost identical, sans the cellular radio, speaker, and microphone.