3 ms·
This is not going to happen. Film producers are not allowed to own distribution. This goes back to the early decades of Hollywood.
by shanghaiaway 8y ago
This is not going to happen. Film producers are not allowed to own distribution. This goes back to the early decades of Hollywood.
- un_montagnard 8y agoIsn't that what Netflix/Amazon Prime Video are doing? Aren't they owning the distribution of their in-house produced shows?
- shanghaiaway 8y agoYes, they are. But that is because it is a new distribution channel that hasn't yet met controversy. I believe producers will be forced to divest distribution once again within the next 5-10 years, whether theatres or digital.
- jasongill 8y ago"Not allowed" by whom? Industry practice? At this point with the modern distracted, over-stimulated consumer, I would assume that these sorts of gentlemen's agreements are headed out the window Also there are multiple examples of production companies owning their distributors which predate Netflix - think Disney and Buena Vista
- shanghaiaway 8y agoNot allowed by the Supreme Court. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_system https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_system
- nostrebored 8y agoThis also had the key component of studios holding exclusivity rights and only showing movies in their theaters.
- adventured 8y agoThat's an incorrect conclusion you're drawing. That ruling doesn't apply an inherent legal barrier to Amazon's situation with Landmark at all. It does not ban movie production companies from owning distribution. An anti-trust review for a given context would be required to determine whether a combination is in violation of anti-trust laws. The Supreme Court in the Paramount case found that particular scheme was in violation, that is all.