5 ms·
To some, further confirmation of the standard model is a disappointment because it doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know or point to some exciting new
by c12 8y ago
To some, further confirmation of the standard model is a disappointment because it doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know or point to some exciting new physics.
- Liron 8y agoPersonally I'd prefer if the established physics we have stays put and the rest of new knowledge mostly falls into the (pretty big) gaps instead of shaking up the solid stuff. Because it seems like it's already complexified to a sufficiently high level.
- SubiculumCode 8y agoIt's that the standard model puts us in a box of boringness, trapped in our little part of the universe no matter our inguenity.
- hsndmoose 8y agoJust trying to unpack your statement. Are you saying we're trapped because the standard model doesn't allow for FTL travel? (This is my assumption based on context) I'm way outside my wheelhouse here for knowing what the standard model allows so please bear with me.
- SubiculumCode 8y agoI am a psychologist so I was also out of my kenning.
- hsndmoose 8y agoYeah I thought about it for a bit and realized my question was pretty dumb if you understand that a basic underpinning of The Standard Model is that you can't exceed the speed of light. It's what I get for my drive-by commenting :)
- SubiculumCode 8y agoyep. that is about all I know :)
- wanda 8y agoI think spullara was being sarcastic, but I could be wrong.
- spullara 8y agoYou're right.
- wanda 8y agoOh my, you're a big shot engineer and investor chap! Sorry, being British and something of a recluse, I don't really talk to people like yourself very often. Now I wish I'd omitted the "but I could be wrong" so I'd have looked a bit more decisive — and, y'know, less guarded-because-I've-been-on-forums-long-enough-to-know-that-I-should-cover-my-ass-against-all-possible-scenarios.
- c12 8y ago:)
- Michael_Groom 8y agoRead this theory, it contains everything the standard model is incapable of explaining, i.e. mass, distribution of normal matter/antimatter dark matter and dark energy after the big bang, decrease of dark matter, increase of dark energy, what DM and DE actually is, et cetera: http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2017-03-17_UC-AOS-en_norbert-winter_the-universe-code_the-unified-composition-and-order-system-of-the-universe.pdf http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2017-03...
- MrQuincle 8y agoMmm... The most basic mathematical entity is a spinor? This can be differentiated? What a nicely behaving universe...
- Michael_Groom 8y agoNo, the fundamental equation 1.1 and 1.2 is structurally similar to the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg, except for two significant differences: 1) 1.1, 1.2 does not contain a dimensionful coupling constant 2) It contains the point-split which Heisenbergs equation is lacking of.
- fabatka 8y agoDo you understand any of this? This notation is entirely unfamiliar to me, and the text seems like gibberish (my favourite expression is "The most colossally great global unification"). I'm also a bit skeptical about one person answering so much big open questions all by himself, while there are a lot of very bright scientists working on them without this much success.
- Michael_Groom 8y agoI do, we are talking about a non-linear spinor dynamic here, omitting the gamma algebra inherited by Dirac spinors. This algebra is well known and omitted as it would render the text confusing indeed as spinor products are of relatively high order (psi-27 and psi-19).