Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DoctorOetker
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
5d ago
For every user asking questions and facing issues for such-or-such firmware or software support they need in their projects, that same user would have appeared regardless if their Pi came from RP directly or through a reseller. Every board
2.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
5d ago
> All of this is pretty irrelevant from a legal perspective. > Reverse engineering is legal, but manufacturers don’t have to help you figure out how to reverse engineer their products and they’re allowed to design their products in a
3.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
5d ago
I certainly agree that such a reseller should clearly state the modification, and not pretend its an authentic RPi 8GB unit. But if this is the real concern, they could just display the fact that "Unoriginal RAM detected" to infor
4.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
5d ago
lets try proof by exhaustion: in those jurisdictions where either price discrimination or locking hardware are not illegal, it is typically perfectly legal to reverse engineer for compatibility purposes . So nothing prevents such resellers
5.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
5d ago
could it be construed as anti-competitive to block end-users or resellers from swapping RAM?
6.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
6d ago
The Millenium Prize problems didn't only withstand decades/century of resolution, they also withstood the same test of time in ridicule of the challenge statement. This list of "Millenium Problems for Biology" contains s
7.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
6d ago
>This sounds insightful until you find yourself debating with the CEO for the eleventh time about how his high-school understanding of the physics involved breaks down in a particular case. didn't musk study physics?
8.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
6d ago
> ... This is just a list of someone's ideas for equivalently difficult (and transformative) unsolved problems in biology. ... I think GP was saying the proof of the pudding is in the tasting: the longer a problem has provably res
9.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
6d ago
thats a poorly implemented reward script, if it leaves you exposed to the mining pool with this gentleman's agreement . the script could have been designed 2 phase, so one first submits a hash of the solution & submitter address,
10.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
7d ago
A gentleman's agreement between the western bloc, China, India, Russia, ... ? It would be a lip service agreement, and all would continue the machine learning race... The mere suggestion of slowing down AI progress signals to adversari
11.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
7d ago
Why not calculate the number of bits necessary before Sol goes supernova? The clock will only be as useful as long as the local star lasts, and when different star systems get populated they or their planets will use local clocks as well. I
12.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
7d ago
if language models (current GPT-style or any future model with different architecture) can be viewed as a compression of their output corpus (the corpus it emits by providing random starting native contexts weighted by the model's like
13.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
7d ago
I don't see the issue at all, consider whatever as a fraction, or just add a denominator of 1: "9 times larger" => multiply the numerator of the fraction with 9 "9 times smaller" => multiply the denominator of
14.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
8d ago
Define the "parallel sum" a∥b=((a*b)/(a+b) A normal sum has the associative property: a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c which justifies dropping the parentheses a+(b+c)=a+b+c=(a+b)+c It is just an exercise for the reader that the parallel sum
15.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
9d ago
not sure why the downvotes? I predict it would be possible to quantify the effects objectively, as a thought experiment: assuming functional proteins, gene regulation is about binding affinities of cellullar chemical species to promoter reg
16.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
10d ago
can't wait until large scale datasets and LLM powered studies either debunk or confirm and quantify the effects objectively.
17.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
Just for contrast I repeat your quoted paragraph with AI “ AI owners are generally not responsible for the 'normal' behaviour of AI s because the law accepts that AI s tend to penetrate victim computer systems and have instin
18.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
"A trader may not, by pursuing a dishonest practice, force his competitors to choose between its adoption or the loss of their trade." Why wasn't this used to stop offshoring of jobs? For each type of industry, which company
19.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
I'm surprised nobody makes a connection with animal ownership / responsibility. If your dog maims someone else, you are responsible for the dog's actions, unless it was self-defense. On the other hand, if people start arguing
20.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
I wonder which murderer will use that argument: "it wasn't my choice to shoot the person, it's just intrinsic to the technology that when pulling the trigger, the pistol fires"
21.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
From an information theory perspective it does not matter how many levels of interpretation are in between, that hardcoded information must pass the genome. for example we can discuss "what about protein synthesis", for example bi
22.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
regardless if the intelligence in the brain is hardcoded or not, to the extent it is, this information must have been compressed in the genome, which runs counter to almost all observations: a child doesn't remember the experience of t
23.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
11d ago
Nothing prevents interleaving inference and gradient descent / RMAD / backpropagation from being interleaved. Is a man a father or a son? It's a false dilemma, it can be both. Is a training step pretraining or finetuning? It&
24.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
14d ago
I can't even parse your question.
25.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
14d ago
I wouldn't call the situation settled, nor do I expect we will ever find out what truly happened: - a rare low likelihood sequence of coincidences - deliberate frontier lab behavior, setting intellectual interrupts on LLM "aha&quo
26.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
15d ago
I wouldn't expect them to destroy that industry, imagine global squadrons of academics and mathematicians focusing their attention on LLM's, training algorithms, scaling laws, ... they're gonna try and beat the incumbent fron
27.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
15d ago
The actual story can be found here: https://archive.org/details/further-nonsense-verse-and-prose...
28.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
15d ago
from a signed image you can always extract just the image
29.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
15d ago
its conflicting desiderata: a videographer doesn't want to constantly power a device to maintain provable continuity, but screen attacks necessitate such a scheme a continuous stream of video from factory to customer to observation sho
30.
▲
by
DoctorOetker
17d ago
I know its the wrong take away, but some would summarize it as: 1) first dissuade others from proving the theorem 2) use child labor to actually prove the theorem
More ›