6 ms·
honest, good faith question: at what point do we say "no more surveillance" and start smashing cameras? the thoughts "we are free" and "total surveillance when
by cryoshon 9y ago
honest, good faith question: at what point do we say "no more surveillance" and start smashing cameras?
the thoughts "we are free" and "total surveillance when in public" are incompatible...
- ycmbntrthrwaway 9y agohttps://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/shortcuts/2013/jan/25/game-destroy-cctv-cameras-berlin https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/shortcuts/2013/jan/2...
- ycmbntrthrwaway 9y agoYou might also want to know that in Christiania, the truely free community until recent "normalization", cameras are mostly prohibited. You can still get your camera smashed for filming strangers. See also: https://www.thelocal.dk/20160923/police-instal-cameras-in-christianias-pusher-street https://www.thelocal.dk/20160923/police-instal-cameras-in-ch... People routinely tear down CCTVs here and in other truely free aka anarchist communities. Another widely known community, Exarcheia, prohibits cameras too.
- shrimp_emoji 9y agoDoes freedom == privacy? I'd argue privacy is merely a facet of freedom, but public privacy is something I don't think our society is designed to support. The only places I expect privacy are in my home and on the Internet (such as it can be). In public, people who anonymize themselves (e.g., with masks or unmarked vehicles) most often seek privacy for criminal reasons (e.g., thieves or violent protesters). Hence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-mask_laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-mask_laws But then a lot of Middle Eastern women seem to usually get away with it in places. If we decide that giving up public privacy is palatable (which you may not), only then can we move on to cameras. If we decide they're too powerful of a surveillance tool, law enforcement bodies are going to have to do a lot more hiring to deter crime! And China's bathrooms will need paper dispenser attendants. Oh, and adopt a no-cellphone Stallman policy or... legislate absolutely Zero Tracking(TM) carrier tower service or something.
- ycmbntrthrwaway 9y agoWhy do you expect anonymity on the Internet, but not in real world?
- shrimp_emoji 9y agoGood question. I guess it's because it's more feasible and because I can't really hurt others here. The worst I can do is manipulate combinations of 1s and 0s to hack their accounts if their services' security isn't up to snuff or something. If someone hacked my bank, I'd blame the bank more than the hackers; if someone broke into my home and robbed or hurt me, I'd be harsher on them than on my door manufacturer! (Perhaps not even because it's easier to secure my door than it is an electronic banking system but because I'd be more hurt...)
- ycmbntrthrwaway 9y agoStill someone breaking into your home will use a mask, and you will not be allowed to when buying things in a store.
- shrimp_emoji 9y agoI'd rather they didn't in either case, although it is unfortunately difficult to acquire goods legitimately yet anonymously, so I lament that too. At the end of the day, Amazon knows a lot about me. Another distinction I just thought of is that while I have the option of having online accounts to be hacked (or silly-named personas to talk with), I have no option of having a physical place in meatspace to inhabit of my own where I keep my stuff. I need one, and, if I can't get one, I have bigger problems than privacy. :c
- chrisvalleybay 9y agoMaybe OP spends most of his time on the computer, and thus expects privacy on the Internet, as it might be his main interface to the world. Now, if OP spent most of his time outside and that was his primary interface to society, he would expect the same privacy there.
- averagewall 9y agoWhat about private cameras, dashcams, cellphones? I can imagine a possibility for a popular app to link them all together and generate a huge private database of images of everyone. What would you smash then?
- icantdrive55 9y agoI don't visit Home Depot like I used to. It's basically the cameras--that are everywhere. Along with the underpaid, miserable employees, and ever increasing monopoly prices. I really despise surveillance, but I am guilty as charged. I have two dash cams in my vechicle. I think I have a good reason though; being pulled over for driving a old car by our Revenue Collectors, having the nerve to drive past 11:00 pm, and just being pulled over because they can. Oh yea, I'm working on a app that will turn on my smart phone whenever it hears, "Officer". I think the only remedy to over surveillance will be legislative. I hear it's illegial to video record store employees in France. I don't know if it's true, but we need some of these privacy laws. They will always counter with terrisiom, and theft/vandalism, and the general public will buy it. Hand up!
- pc86 9y ago"I have a good reason to surveil others, but others better stop surveiling me."
- EGreg 9y agoWhat point? Sir, it's too late. At no point. In any country. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TlO2gcs1YvM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TlO2gcs1YvM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DjUdVxJH6yI https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DjUdVxJH6yI
- boobsbr 9y agoSmash a camera and get immediately arrested.