3 ms·
You inherently get a better sense of the pattern since you can use stereoscopic vision rather than parallax+movement. It could give you a better sense of wha
by hwillis 9y ago
You inherently get a better sense of the pattern since you can use stereoscopic vision rather than parallax+movement.
It could give you a better sense of what a complicated shape looks like. When you look at something complex enough[1] it helps to get as much information as possible. The eyes alone are not optimal for grokking it, even when the shape is moving around[2].
[1] https://images4.sw-cdn.net/product/picture/710x528_583780_191804_1459313060.jpg https://images4.sw-cdn.net/product/picture/710x528_583780_19...
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9YAAS0cZ_w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9YAAS0cZ_w
also all hail king Quilez, master wizard
- amelius 9y agoOk, but why not use VR goggles?
- Neliquat 9y agoBecause VR still sucks, and even good VR still messes with sense of proportion. Easier for most just to handle the object. But for complex or impractical to print items, it is a fantastic idea used by most modern engineering companies.
- hwillis 9y agoPart of it is the sense of touch, weight, inertia and angular momentum. Like knowing how full a bottle is when you shake it.