3 ms·
I'm enthusiastic about the potential for this technology but I don't like either of these options. I feel like both the customer and the product. I'd like an op
by talktime 10y ago
I'm enthusiastic about the potential for this technology but I don't like either of these options. I feel like both the customer and the product. I'd like an open source, neutral voice assistant that is working for me, not trying to exploit me.
- candiodari 10y agoNeither of those options is very scriptable either. They just kinda suck. None of them have any compatibility with actually used home automation ("computer ! lights !" is actually useful). You're right. We need an assistant that's just a piece of software. Paid for, working for me, not caring which messenger it has to use.
- amelius 10y agoScriptability, security, privacy, latency. The list goes on.
- notheguyouthink 10y agoYup. I'm not really going to be interested in this landscape until i can get a full NLP / Intent Recognition / Voice Transcripting package in my home, completely offline. I'm not even paranoid about the NSA/etc either, i'm paranoid about a potential 3rd party listening in and knowing when to rob my home, or viewing my family through the IP camera, etcetc. I want a smart home. I don't want an internet connected smart home. It's simply too dangerous.
- alexdeloy 10y agoI stumbled upon kalliope recently (https://github.com/kalliope-project/kalliope https://github.com/kalliope-project/kalliope). I tried it a few weeks ago and was pleased with it in general but it still needed an online connection in order to parse your commands. According to the changelog they added the option for an offline STT recognition now.