Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zw123456
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
72 ms
·
781.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
hmmm, could be I am confusing sociopathy and autism ?
782.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I have often thought that autistic people or socio-path people who have had to learn the appropriate responses to various human emotions would be a good resource for AI research in the area of developing more "human like" interact
783.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Some years back I worked for a large corporation on a team that had a large number of "engineers" doing what seemed like pretty rudimentary work so I wrote a program to automate about 90% of the job functions. I thought I would be
784.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I think Low speed limits are a source of revenue for a lot of cities.
785.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Excellent work and very entertaining. However... over the years I have read many similar books although not as fun as this one, and what I have found is that the people who most need to read and understand it won't and wouldn't. A
786.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
This was a pretty good overview. I get asked this same question a lot because I have been working with microprocessors for decades and I have used many different ones from the old 8051 to Microchip, Arm and even FPGA embedded. The way I us
787.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Yes, of course. Obviously if the IRS knows your income, knows you mortgage interest, interest on savings and dividends and it is all electronically recorded, there what is the point of filing. Only to keep accountants and tax software compa
788.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Great read! I must admit, I have thought about this a few times in the past when I was on an airplane and thought what would I do if the plane split in two and thought about some of the things the author mentioned. One more tip, always wea
789.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I was being a little flip of course, IQ is generally accepted to be a Gaussian distribution which is symmetrical, the mean and average are at 50 percentile so it is a little bit of a math joke that of course then, 50% of the people in a lar
790.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Major flaw with democracy, 50% of electorate has below average IQ.
791.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I absolutely love these obscure pop sub-references. Thank you for the post, it tickled my funny bone.
792.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I get it the point they were trying to make is that you cannot understand the software by looking at the hardware. But I also agree that the analogy is very weak.
793.
▲
DARPA’s Program to Protect the U.S. President in the 1960s
(thedailybeast.com)
4 points
by
zw123456
10y ago
|
0 comments
794.
▲
Osage Indian family was target of one of the most sinister crimes in US history
(newyorker.com)
2 points
by
zw123456
10y ago
|
0 comments
795.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
There is another factor that weighs into this, almost all of the carriers have aspects of throttling in their "unlimited" plans which, under the previous administrations interpretation of Network Neutrality would probably not have
796.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Yes, but even so, they also have half bridge chips, all the biasing and compensation, the correct diodes etc. The point is, a motor controller chip is more modern way that the old transistor or MOSFET way. unless you are designing some chea
797.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
While we are on the topic of using more modern parts, if you are controlling a motor as shown in the example, why not use an H-Bridge chip ?
798.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I have seen articles similar to this one a number of times. The thing that I wonder about is if there are certain personality types that would be less sensitive than others while still able to remain objective in terms of applying the stand
799.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I actually did a test myself with pot a while back, also playing against a computer, my thinking there was that it would provide the most consistent opponent skill level. I tried varying amounts. I saw a fairly significant improvement with
800.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I think there are limitations to how much someone can change. The analogy I would use is physical traits, you can loose weight, or you can exercise and increase strength and so on but there are limitations. I am 59 and no matter how hard I
801.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Those are definitely cellular frequencies (LTE but also PCS, AWS and others) http://niviuk.free.fr/lte_band.php . I noticed the EIRP they are talking about is 300mw in the Kennewick test which is extremely low but then they
802.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
My theory about innovation (and I think is related to creativity) is that humans are inherently very innovative. I think that is why we have been so successful as a species. But there are many organizations and constructs in society that te
803.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Being unpredictable is not the same thing as being random. In chess or even football or other sports, you don't want to telegraph to your competitor what your next move is. For example if the other team knows you always run a draw play
804.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I know right, I want to build one :)
805.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
I have to do another post on this. http://asa.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1121/1.1974668 This has been a pet theory of mine monkeys hearing is not very good below 8khz, down as much as 60db in the 4khz and belo
806.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
OK, I stand corrected, maybe parrots understand what they are saying, but the core of my question is why can parrots speak and monkeys cannot?
807.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
So why can parrots be taught to speak? Of course they do not understand what they are saying but they can be trained to say words. Monkeys can be trained to do some pretty complex things in comparison to what a bird can do, it seems to me m
808.
▲
Obama Signs a Shadowy New Anti-Propaganda Center
(alternet.org)
5 points
by
zw123456
10y ago
|
1 comments
809.
▲
Preliminary Design of an Experimental World-Circling Spaceship: 5/2/46 [pdf]
(nro.gov)
1 points
by
zw123456
10y ago
|
0 comments
810.
▲
by
zw123456
10y ago
Good point, if I push myself too far then I end up focusing too much on the push. But on the other hand if I don't push at least part of the time, the end feeling is not as rewarding.
More ›