Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zupa-hu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
zupa-hu
4y ago
Thanks for elaborating on this! I’ve learned something today. I couldn’t make up a more misleading name if my life depended on it.. EDIT: Reading the page in more detail, it seems to me relational means both. Indeed each field of a row ha
92.
▲
by
zupa-hu
4y ago
Lol what a nugget! Summarizes the article pretty well.
93.
▲
by
zupa-hu
4y ago
Speed might well be one.
94.
▲
by
zupa-hu
4y ago
Problem is, people don’t read before forming a first impression.
95.
▲
by
zupa-hu
4y ago
I think your comment is missing a crucial point or the principle, which is that "a computer can be viewed as one of the participants". Thus writing a program is communicating your intent to the computer. I see that hard to dispute
96.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
The page explains the “terms” as: “Sequoia will invest $1M in the form of equity to participating companies at the start of the program.” I guess that’s neither the terms (I mean, that’s all?) nor are they investing “in the form of equity”.
97.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
We (me & partner) have been playing with that idea for a while. It's like taking out the trash. Would love to find any info on that. (Like past experiments, or find data on average life-span for regular blood-donors.)
98.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
That's a strange question given the thread. You are either an AI that doesn't get the context or you have already chewed too much on them. In case it's not the first: having lead in your mouth contributes to lead poisoning.
99.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
And of course one could bite them onto the string. I did it quite a few times.
100.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Free No-Code Website Builder + Web Application Platform - https://boomla.com/ - https://developer.boomla.com/ These are really 2 distinct products. I wanted to build a website builder that made sense, which
101.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
This. The requirement for trust is not eliminated just shifted. That’s the elephant in the room.
102.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
This. If the project was reimplemented in assembly, it would be faster and smaller and the same conclusion could be drawn: “finally the high level programming hype is over”. come on..
103.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Welcome to now. Totally works like 99.99% of the time.
104.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Note the original ancestor comment I've reacted to: > Jordan Peterson talks about many topics he's not trained in without citing reliable sources. We should all have the right to talk about topics without acquiring official tra
105.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
I think the issue is both the commanding tone most of the time that the commenter who submitted the claim somehow must do the work of finding a citation and posting it as proof. But what _is_ a citation after all? Just someone else saying t
106.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Ah I am totally tired of these comments (parent). It’s like according to them you can’t say anything without citing a source. [1] [1] citation needed
107.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
There is the podcast version as well which you can listen to on the go or while having your morning coffee. I'm glad it's not shorter. :)
108.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Give a bit more context on what you are already using so we are not shooting in the dark. You are likely already using these: With a typed language the compiler helps you refactor more efficiently. No spaghetti code, instead move logic into
109.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Hello, I’m one of them! For context, I’m a software engineer but also do design because I have to (startup, a free no/code website builder, boomla.com). I even bought a Mac for running Sketch but I just couldn’t use both platforms beca
110.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Even if it shouldn’t, does it really matter? If you can’t change it, regardless the reasons, and getting an SSD is a fairly cheap/simple solution, then why wouldn’t you just get an SSD? Nobrainer.
111.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Get an SSD
112.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
That's not what I meant. You can err on either side and both directions have their costs, which are much clearer in hindsight. There is a reason why the game doesn't predict the future. Because we don't know it. I specificall
113.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
It's really cool, it's so powerful that it makes people realize the trade-offs. The only problem is that in hindsight of course we can do pretty well. I guess most governments could do better after the fact. Too bad you can't
114.
▲
Show HN: Turbo UI, a CSS framework + element library built on Turbo CSS [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
|
0 comments
115.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Interesting take, I really like the 2x2 table that brings such clarity. Funnily, my mind immediately jumped to the question on how to convert the feedback loop types to a better one. Of course, the whole point of the article is that it is n
116.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Very good points, thanks!
117.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Oh that's an interesting aspect. I was on the lookout for immediate consequences. Thanks for clarifying!
118.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
I don't really get the "nightmare" consequences. Sure, some electric systems will go down / maybe burn down. But few people will die, right? When I saw nightmare in the title, I expected something like humanity will be w
119.
▲
by
zupa-hu
5y ago
Came here to say the same. I really appreciate the awesome service. I also really appreciate being upfront with the incident. I badly hope nobody is going to be offensive here. (Mind you, I’m watching!) THANK YOU, Dan!
120.
▲
by
zupa-hu
6y ago
> 1) Duck out isn’t a thing, just stop it. Well, 1) sorry but you don't get to decide this, 2) how would anything ever become a thing if people were not allowed to invent new things? - I'm not favoring the term just opposing yo
More ›