zuckmitnick

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   Yeah, that's nice. I will, when I need your help. Thx
2. 2.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   This means something like 'reasoning'. Eg, you ask the virtual brain 'why is the sky blue?' 'why is the sky sometimes grey?', and it may not tell you why. Google's virtual brain can 'recognize' things from the images, but it cannot handle t
3. 3.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   This is really challenging. I think my theory is completely new, and I'm not sure if it could work, so for about 4 years I've been working on this alone. If I can prove its correctness by creating my first workable demo, I will start my sta
4. 4.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   Well, most AI techs that exists right now are built upon rules. A very early example may be the chess machine "deep blue", who defeated the world champion Kasparov. A recent one could be Google's virtual brain, who "understood" the concept
5. 5.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   Yeah, that is surely a step forward. But simulating a worm is way too far from simulating a human brain. And also I'm not sure if this is a right path (Just IMHO). Luckily, I've been working on the framework of simulating the human brain an
6. 6.▲
   by zuckmitnick 14y ago

   AI is not an explicit subject like math and physics, which has solid principles. It's just about searching for a way of providing the machines an ability to "think", whatever the way you choose. Different people understand the word "think"