zokier

39 ms·

901.
by zokier 2y ago
Microsoft has PowerShell and DSC as their automation solution. Its pretty ridiculous to say that they are not providing that.
902.
by zokier 2y ago
Microsoft also has userspace APIs available, such as AMSI https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/amsi/antimal...
903.
by zokier 2y ago
What are these then [77384.469522] Modules linked in: falcon_lsm_serviceable(PE) falcon_nf_netcontain(PE) falcon_kal(E) falcon_lsm_pinned_16303(E)
904.
by zokier 2y ago
I think this question has been already largely been answered by automatic style (etc) tools. Such tools generally should not make semantic changes to programs, so they (implicitly) define what are meaningful semantic changes and what are me
905.
by zokier 2y ago
ls is the archetypical example of unix gone wrong, and I think this was already widely discussed (and joked) about in early 90s (iirc unix haters had something about that). It should be just simple wrapper for readdir, but it grew into spra
906.
by zokier 2y ago
find -type f -printf '%M@ %p\0' | sort -zn | tail -z | sed -z 's/^[0-9.]* //' | ... Ugh.. so unixy
907.
by zokier 2y ago
Plastic?
908.
by zokier 2y ago
I personally think the bottom line here is that markdown simply isn't intended nor well suited for anything complex such as tables or diagrams or any such things that have been bolted on afterwards.
909.
by zokier 2y ago
Going through TAI is probably the best way for me, I'll have to play around with Jiff to see how practical that is. I'm glad if there is good support for TAI though! One random use-case (reminded by other thread on the front-page)
910.
by zokier 2y ago
Yes, that was what I was referring to with > I appreciate that it was at least informed decision, and seems to have been tough call to make but you are right, having that link here helps others.
911.
by zokier 2y ago
That doesn't change the situation of past leap seconds in any way, those still need to be accounted for.
912.
by zokier 2y ago
While this does seem to be an improvement in general, I find it extremely disappointing that we now got another, greenfield, library that ignores leap seconds and continues the propagation of UNIXy time. I appreciate that it was at least in
913.
by zokier 2y ago
Mirror objectives do exist for dslrs: https://advancedphototech.wordpress.com/lenses/mirror-mirror...
914.
by zokier 2y ago
> It’s unwise to discard these investments or be reluctant to recover them, especially when the cost is a simple message and conversation every now and then. Hilariously out of touch quote in article that is on a surface level so thoroug
915.
by zokier 2y ago
Remember WannaCry? The vuln it used was patched by MS two months prior the attack. Yet it took the world by storm.
916.
by zokier 2y ago
I do see a connection here to how companies have been increasingly becoming hyperfocused on specializing what they perceive as their core domain, and outsourcing absolutely everything else. It used to be that companies owned, and were proud
917.
by zokier 2y ago
It's pretty rare to see a post that I agree on so wholeheartedly. The big question is though, how do you make business work in FOSS context. I'm glad that SourceHut is doing well, but I suspect it thrives partially due being small
918.
by zokier 2y ago
Github is social media
919.
by zokier 2y ago
Only weird thing is why they are so late to the party; first-party proxying is so obvious (and not novel) solution, they could have pushed this out already five or ten years ago. This is also the reason why I have been always dubious on PiH
920.
by zokier 2y ago
Which wouldn't help much when tracking happens on server-side. By the time your adblocker is able to analyze the response Google will already have tracked your visit.
921.
by zokier 2y ago
When Chrome came out, Microsoft was in no position to dictate anything web-related; they barely managed to get IE7 released and it was playing massive catchup to Firefox (and Opera) in regards to standards, and didn't really bring any
922.
by zokier 2y ago
GitHub "community" is just awful. There are people trying to get real work done in that thread, but then there are all these random bystanders piling up to throw in their comments which range from useless to actively harmful and d
923.
by zokier 2y ago
> I've not yet seen a study that shows that virtual threads offer a huge benefit. Not exactly Java virtual threads, but a study on how userland threads beat kernel threads. https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~mkarsten/pape
924.
by zokier 2y ago
> The OS scheduler is still there (for the carrier threads), but now you've added on top of that FJ pool based scheduler overhead. Ideally carrier threads would be pinned to isolated cpu cores, which removes most aspects of OS sched
925.
by zokier 2y ago
> Can the JVM do threads better than the OS? Yes. The JVM has far more opportunities for optimizing threads because it doesn't need to uphold 50 years of accumulated invariants and compatibility that current OSes do, and JVM has mor
926.
by zokier 2y ago
Systemtap, for whatever reason, remained largely RedHat solution. It didn't really have much traction outside that diaspora.
927.
by zokier 2y ago
LD_PRELOAD is bit yucky though in my opinion. I suppose ptrace is the only other option though :/
928.
by zokier 2y ago
Next step PPP, and/or RTK. GNSS provides delightful rabbithole of possibilities.
929.
by zokier 2y ago
from that link > Moreover, the clocks on satellites don’t have to be explicitly slowed down to fix the cumulative relativistic speed-up of time. As part of their broadcasted message a satellite emits three coefficients that allow the rec
930.
by zokier 2y ago
> and which shouldn't be used. my rule of thumb is that if its name begins with str then it shouldn't be used.

More ›