zobzu

43 ms·

601.
by zobzu 12y ago
Wll thats pretty awesome :) I'm hoping we don't have to patch everything tomorrow but.. ;) On a side note - a lot of libs start to implement their own crypto because "OpenSSL code sux its terrible and buggy!" impression.
602.
by zobzu 12y ago
"nearline, still online, but we could make a graph that is supposed to make you believe its not"
603.
by zobzu 12y ago
That's because you're supposed to store all your data on Google servers (this is not sarcasm). For 1000 USD however this is ridiculous. Just go DELL or Asus or similar. The XPS13 is excellent for example, come with proper ports, d
604.
by zobzu 12y ago
if you give enough details you'll always find a way to work around words. For example if i ship a copy of webkit with my ui on top with a sandbox I'll pioneer that. Or a shell. Or a text editor. Or whatever you want. A blue wheel
605.
by zobzu 12y ago
they actually do the control in a very similar way. its the model of how the control is decided that differs. in other words, they're all blocking syscalls depending on the arguments/syscall name/etc. LSMs and seccomp-bpf al
606.
by zobzu 12y ago
Not to mention that ethanol means using food supplies - which, you know, a lot of people could use. (world hunger still being a problem)
607.
by zobzu 12y ago
Interestingly in many games of the 90s... - there were both genders more often (in, fact, i can name very few of the games I played that were male only... yeah DukeNukem for ex. I know a couple female only games, tho) - when different gende
608.
by zobzu 12y ago
You believe . And that's exactly why people died for principles such as innocent until proven guilty. Regardless of the cause. Heck, if people didn't believe stuff at random we'd have far less wars.
609.
by zobzu 12y ago
Chrome certainly didn't pioneer anything. Google devs brought seccomp-bpf to the kernel, which is a simpler alternative (but also not always as useable) to many other mechanisms. Chrome is one of the first products on linux with a la
610.
by zobzu 12y ago
it synchronize all the process's threads to use the same seccomp filter (seccomp being a sandbox mechanism - a bit like a firewall for system calls). Threads on Linux are very close to an equivalent of "separate process" exce
611.
by zobzu 12y ago
Wow that's extreme. They could broadcast seccomp across thread for older kernels. One day it's going to be "use Google's fork of the kernel". Of course, Firefox and others work fine on "older" kernels.
612.
by zobzu 12y ago
You know the problem with these claims is that you never know what actually happened. I find that quite often these threads just reinforce the hate and blindness in people - it doesn't fix anything. You get called out for kindly offeri
613.
by zobzu 12y ago
its been kind of nice to have textsecure as an option when internet is not available (which sadly happens a lot especially for travelers...) I understand the decision is, again, for the greater good, but I can't help to think it's
614.
by zobzu 12y ago
And nowhere does it says customers want products that intentionally last a year instead of 10.
615.
by zobzu 12y ago
This is related to Moxie's blog post from last week just before the release of this software - which is textsecure for iOS - see http://www.thoughtcrime.org/software.html . Man, you guys can't remember a thing for
616.
by zobzu 12y ago
Great app - but I fail to see how that's going to replace GnuPG.
617.
by zobzu 12y ago
Sounds like FirefoxOS.
618.
by zobzu 12y ago
all he means behind the sensationalistic crap is that the sata controller is not actually needed, its there for compatibility. "hard disk" will not be the ram. its just is made of the same chips, but still logically separated. and
619.
by zobzu 12y ago
You compared the total of PGP users to textsecure saying textsecure has more hence my reply on that (just clarifying) Or least, that was my understanding of your previous comment You're basically kinda saying there is between 11millio
620.
by zobzu 12y ago
Having it installed doesn't mean using it, like you said, for the PGP keys being generated but not necessarily in use. On textsecure usage In my experience, very very few people actually sign keys, and few people upload them on keyse
621.
by zobzu 12y ago
Yeah and thats a flawed number since most ppl dont get a zillion signatures. What it really means is that people don't use the web of trust that much. Most people I encounter do not sign keys, they just verify they've seen the sam
622.
Easy to use, in-browser PGP encryption(mailvelope.com)
3 points by zobzu 12y ago|0 comments
623.
by zobzu 12y ago
keybase proves who you are.. if you trust keybase
624.
by zobzu 12y ago
Still would like to see your source for the "50k active user base" claim.
625.
by zobzu 12y ago
Its like saying notepad is a popular because its installed with Windows.
626.
by zobzu 12y ago
theres a lot of reasons, its more expensive to hire, form and fire than not hire for one. Then, there are relationships with colleagues and between employees regardless of performance, if you fire very rarely then your employees are happier
627.
by zobzu 12y ago
Seem both Apple and Google are doing this. (as in "stifling")
628.
by zobzu 12y ago
The Uber claim is about the bay area/sf only. Then the counter study is about the USA average for Uber. Based on that, I can't say who tells the truth - but I can certainly say that I don't believe anything from this article
629.
by zobzu 12y ago
this is pretty close to the process we have here at <undisclosed bay area company> And indeed, if you had to go through all this it means they very seriously considered you for the position. Now, the expenses they made mean little (ev
630.
by zobzu 12y ago
To be technically precise what makes 2FA easy to use is that all services are web-enabled and issue you a temporary-long-term token (ie a cookie with a session id). If you had to open an app on your phone at each login you'd get crazy

More ›