zobzu

52 ms·

631.
by zobzu 12y ago
The issue is that it seems like you want to replace GnuPG by something that does the same - but is made better, and that has your brand name on it. That's very marketingish of you. Why not fix GnuPG instead? There's more than slap
632.
by zobzu 12y ago
If you break the app you have +- the same access.. see if you break irssi you're not root either. This stuff is only sort-of reliable when-containers-dont-have-root-bug-today if you run that as a separate user than yourself in a differ
633.
by zobzu 12y ago
slightly overkill on the coloring ;)
634.
Mozilla on Key management(wiki.mozilla.org)
1 points by zobzu 12y ago|0 comments
635.
by zobzu 12y ago
Yeah i wish he elaborated a bit on this since it seems the critical and difficult part (well once people let you grow the forest in peace that is..)
636.
by zobzu 12y ago
The argument for being corporate cant go both way tho. What matters is how public perceives this, too. Posting corp stuff on the org domain/site means that then they are fully corporate-like. Which maybe is simply the case. You can&#x2
637.
Intel is currently number one Linux kernel contributor(linuxfoundation.org)
3 points by zobzu 12y ago|0 comments
638.
by zobzu 12y ago
"A bit about Mark: he is well known as an elite technical leader not only within Mozilla, but in our industry." Anyone knows him outside of Mozilla?
639.
by zobzu 12y ago
That's posted on mozilla.org, not mozilla.com tho. There's a fine balance between the two.
640.
by zobzu 12y ago
This is really nicely done! High in FPS too :)
641.
by zobzu 12y ago
id like if all my stuff took 100x1min as in the author story ;)
642.
by zobzu 12y ago
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/a7c177546ca0/secu... its not actually hard to read/find
643.
by zobzu 12y ago
Note that it still uses way more ram than firefox regardless. in firefox right now.. ive 4 tabs open and been using it for 2 hours.. 246megs used. I just started chromium 42.. open hacker news and theverge.. boom already at 311megs.(thats m
644.
by zobzu 12y ago
to be a little more fair safari made webkit possible (and thus chrome)..
645.
by zobzu 12y ago
this comment is sadly very accurate ;) The worse part IMO is that companies indeed play on that effect, and people, even smart techies will always fall for the new cool. We have such a tendency to have to follow trends in groups.. its a lit
646.
by zobzu 12y ago
A bunch of adware reinstall it actually, because they get money from Google for that. On a clean system its pretty simple to uninstall.
647.
by zobzu 12y ago
You do realize that Mozilla does not actually get 1M/day from Google right now.. right?
648.
by zobzu 12y ago
Its more of a google issue to be honest. Anyway just click here with firefox https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-uk/ and you'll have google.co.uk :)
649.
by zobzu 12y ago
Firefox 3.6 was pretty slow compared to Firefox today. I would switch again to Chrome if we were in Firefox 3.6 times. Turns out, they fixed Firefox up pretty good over the years
650.
by zobzu 12y ago
I'll just throw that in there but Firefox Linux - since you refer to that (99% of what you just mentioned doesnt exit on windows/osx) - so yeah, Firefox for Linux uses the Chromium sandbox. You know, the exact same code, with a di
651.
by zobzu 12y ago
Do you fear that by the time shumway actually works for "most ppl stuff" flash would already be gone and the effort wasted? (its gone from YT..)
652.
by zobzu 12y ago
Sounds like a package manager with s/glibc/go packages/ and s/otherlibs/go packages/ Not necessarily bad but. In fact this is similar to how Go replaces the OS scheduling and message passing. Maybe its a necess
653.
by zobzu 12y ago
for i worked in several similar companies, indeed, its extremely rare that such data is well protected. it works under the assumption that if its not been broken into until now then its safe enough. obviously that's broken logic since.
654.
by zobzu 12y ago
got notified twice by anthem (email) and once by company (hr got contacted by anthem) but they still havent confirmed if my data has been disclosed (obviously, i suppose it has)
655.
by zobzu 12y ago
even in tech companies (even Google) security is handle like that
656.
by zobzu 12y ago
Well you could have managed images in a VM, many do that, incl. ppl just using ec2. you could also do that using lxc, or what not, not necessarily with docker. So basically, ocker adds nothing to these other solutions except complication, b
657.
by zobzu 12y ago
Its more about freedom than security tho. Really if anything, EME is about security for vendors, not users. Really, not much to do with the fact that it's sandboxed. Its not like if proprietary, freedom-restricting software was suddenl
658.
by zobzu 12y ago
The security products arent great, true, but the ppl working as security engineers in companies are often quite decent. It seems to me that its the usual issue. People don't see the need for protection until they've been hit. It s
659.
by zobzu 12y ago
cant find the talk list yet. being in SF and being github i suspect it may attract quite a wide range of ppl, which could be interesting
660.
by zobzu 12y ago
Seems also to work if you have only cutting edge SSH (since its split by modern/intermediate) which is nice

More ›