Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zmmmmm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
751.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
The limitations of S3 (and all the cloud "file systems") are quite astonishing when you consider you're paying for it as a premium service. Try to imagine your astonishment if a traditional storage vendor showed up and told y
752.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Conversation needs to shift to "market power" which is where the EU has gone. The fact that Apple shares the App store market with Android evenly in terms of users for example is meaningless when they nonetheless hold the vast maj
753.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
When reason fails to explain people's actions, it gives you a measure of the strength of their ideology on something. In this case, you can see how deeply they believe in the concept of complete authoritarian control of their ecosystem
754.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Yeah it's a great point. In some ways here we are seeing the exact illustration of that point. If they only cared about user experience and quality they wouldn't sacrifice their user's interests by forcing them through convol
755.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
In some ways it makes me question if it's impossible to have one without the other - can you have a company that is as obsessive about quality as Apple at the same time as one that won't attempt to exert monopolistic control over
756.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
They create dedicated hardware designed to excel at gaming and then sell it at or near cost. In a very real sense they create the market that games producers sell into, and the business model is explicitly centered around those software sal
757.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Epic doesn't want those users. It is not asking for any placement in the app store. It just wants it's own users who have iPhones to be able to access its software which it will funnel to them through their own channel. Apple cont
758.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
It's a good question. From the EU point of view it may be simply one of scale. If any of those held the amount of market power Apple does, I suspect the EU would designate them Gatekeepers and we would be off to the races. From the gam
759.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
thanks! will try that out
760.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Would love a way to see these in 3D in VR / MR.
761.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
I hope the EU calls them on this and mandates that they offer equivalent OS API support for 3rd party browsers to implement PWAs to what Safari had at the time their initial ruling was made . Let's then watch how fast Apple restores P
762.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
The question I would like to know is whether that just leads you back to hallucinations. ie: is the avoidance of hallucinations intrinsically due to forcing the LLM to consider limited context, rather than directing it to specific /
763.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Because it is chicken feed to them but sets a floor that represents a significant barrier for other players that might seek to get the same type of deal?
764.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
I don't disagree but I think it's not a question of "why" but "how". It could still be licensed in a restricted way, but keeping secret how it works is unfortunate - it breaks the chain of learning that is ha
765.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
As a virtual reality geek, this is super exciting because although there are numerous people experimenting with voicing NPCs with LLMs, they all have horrible latency and are unusable in practice. This looks like the first one that can actu
766.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
then you can't have a chatbot but if that is your standard, you can't have an airline either
767.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Our organization tried to buy an A100 last year. We were informed 12 months wait. nVidia can literally just print money at this point for the next 5 years I think.
768.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
I'm curious what people would estimate is an actual reasonable cost for egress? As in, what it costs to provide that service plus a sensible margin? It seems to me that eventually it will come to pass that competition regulators start
769.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Does hololens really not depend on WMR at all?
770.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Am watching this carefully to try and judge Apple's intentions with Vision Pro. Unfortunately as this article demonstrates, they only have to slightly impair the capabilities of it to pretty much force everyone into writing native apps
771.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Seems likely the team was gutted specifically because they are refocusing on a new strategy.
772.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
It's an interesting test for them. Essentially, it's a free hit - low expectations, few constraints, lots of latitude to throw out prior work, open ended opportunity to be creative and innovate, a clear baseline provided by Apple
773.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
To be clear, not advocating for FOSS here, in fact almost the opposite, I want the full force of capitalism to be free to solve these problems without arbitrary barriers erected by big tech gatekeepers.
774.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
I will just say that I think you're an outlier on the quality / perception spectrum. It's definitely very personal, so this is completely normal, but I don't think you are even slightly representative of where the genera
775.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
It doesn't bother you that your spouse can't see it? Even with an iPad, they are still sharing the space with you because they peripherally see what you are are doing, watching, etc. If something particularly interesting was on th
776.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
> I wish the Quest 3 was as good as the vision pro. It isn't. It's not even close That in itself is a false question, no? Nobody says they are as good. I haven't seen even the most ardent Meta fan suggest such a thing. It&
777.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
He started off talking about how Vision Pro is not an open platform like MacOS and then he focused on how his productivity use case couldn't be realised because of lack of multiple screens. But he failed to draw the link between these.
778.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
it's a future risk I think but not a current one in any way shape or form in the Quest platform. They meticulously ask permission for every app that uses eye / camera / spatial data, even their own. I would say in some sense
779.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
Yes Quest 3 is a completely different ball game to Quest 2 as far as this goes. Quest 2 resolution and lenses were completely unusable for me and Quest 3 is usable. But there are people that will say Quest 3 is unusable so you have to reall
780.
▲
by
zmmmmm
3y ago
that's the real problem with these devices ... it has to actually get boring before you can tell if it's got real value or not. And that takes a long time precisely because the novelty is so high and so interesting. But it w
More ›