zjuventus14

4 ms·

1.
by zjuventus14 9mo ago
Do you have any source for these numbers & the equivalent for auto travel? Would be interested to see - I’m generally aware of the cost vs. fare side of subways, but haven’t seen numbers that support individual car travel being cheaper
2.
by zjuventus14 9mo ago
Seems clear to me that poisonous != deadly poisonous by GPs - as they stated, many of the poisonous mushrooms have mild side effects, like “makes a hangover worse.” So 20% is definitely high for deadly poisonous, but not for inedible/m
3.
by zjuventus14 11mo ago
Are you suggesting that less “free” (cost-bundled) parking spaces would lead to more cars? Or do you just mean from an aesthetic perspective more street parking would be used when you say cities would be more littered with cars? We’ve ended
4.
by zjuventus14 2y ago
Highly recommend the book “Against Intellectual Monopoly” which argues against IP law with a lot of historical references. One such example is paint & coloring in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. From the book - “In 1862, British
5.
by zjuventus14 2y ago
I don’t entirely disagree - subsidies aren’t a perfect solution. But the current system is so far from perfect that I think considering alternatives is worthwhile. I’d be curious how many actual world-changing innovations were ONLY pursued
6.
by zjuventus14 2y ago
It’s true that copyright and patents make pursuing certain risky (from a monetary perspective) innovations that are valuable to society worthwhile. But they’re only one way of solving that problem. We choose to apply copyright almost univer
7.
by zjuventus14 2y ago
I mean the goal of GPLv3 and other copyleft licenses is to ensure that innovation building on the licensed work is also made available so others may continue to innovate, no? In my mind reducing copyright terms is aligned to that goal. You