zionic

15 ms·

241.
by zionic 4y ago
Maybe this is a good place to ask since there's a lot of web devs here: What is SO effing hard about drawing within the screen on web?! I can't tell you the number of times I've seen this issue. Just the other day I saw reddi
242.
by zionic 4y ago
Wow, this anonymous person leaves your house every morning and comes back!
243.
by zionic 4y ago
Heh, that reminds me: Officer: Sir, how high are you? Dude: No officer, it’s high how are you
244.
by zionic 4y ago
Isn’t that just naked elitism? If you reject anything the major papers don’t publish how are you any different then a 15th century peasant following the clergy? Let’s be real, you don’t understand any of this either. You’re simply choosing
245.
by zionic 4y ago
Flame retardants have no measurable impact on burn rate once the burn has started. We literally coated everything in carcinogenic chemicals for the dumbest of reasons.
246.
by zionic 4y ago
Zip + metal stud + rockwool and you’re g2g
247.
by zionic 4y ago
My argument is the net harm of coating everything in carcinogens and endocrine disruptors outweighs the fringe benefit. Flame retardants don’t eliminate fire, they give you an extremely small chance of preventing one in very specific scenar
248.
by zionic 4y ago
Look up “zip system 2.0 Matt Risinger” on YouTube. Seems like the best available today.
249.
by zionic 4y ago
PEX is toxic and should be banned if we had a functional government here in the US. The leech rates are absolutely crazy. Copper is the only way, ideally pro-press
250.
by zionic 4y ago
They’re not good though. Hold an open flame or shorting electrical wire to a coated surface and it will burn just the same. Flame retardants only really give you a slight edge vs a burning cigarette on a couch. We coated our couches, clothe
251.
by zionic 4y ago
Sure, but you can’t control the dose on an entire population. Let’s say only 1% of people get brain cancer because of their habits/lifestyle. That’s still unacceptable, despite 99% not getting a dose that’s lethal. An example of this t
252.
by zionic 4y ago
>in a 2nd tier food journal I'm not taking either side here because I don't know enough to feel confident doing so, but I do have an issue with statements like this. The paper should stand or fall on its own merits, if we only
253.
by zionic 4y ago
>The ONLY way to solve the toxic nature of Twitter is to enforce a)a real name policy, and b)fully verified[1] identities for all users/bots Have you uh, seen "NextDoor"?
254.
by zionic 4y ago
> The list it is on is about what words to use in external product documentation and marketing. So this list is real, you own it, and you acknowledge that as a continued employee you are supporting this nonsense?
255.
by zionic 4y ago
Can’t edit anymore: for what it’s worth the Tesla in the video was operating on the “summon” stack
256.
by zionic 4y ago
At these wealth levels it’s not about “productivity” anymore lol
257.
by zionic 4y ago
I disagree. Let’s assume OP is talented, his talent can best be used for google’s competitors. Meanwhile, Google is rotten at the executive layer. No amount of good people working for them will fix things.
258.
by zionic 4y ago
Surprising lack of technical knowledge here about the current state of Tesla self driving. Tesla current has 3 wildly different software stacks: -FSD (invite only beta): this is their latest and greatest that everyone talks about. Surface s
259.
by zionic 4y ago
I mean sure, I’d love a scalpel but right now we don’t even have a hammer. It would be fantastic to do something even as simple as shut off the hunger signal for set intervals. Imagine if you literally couldn’t feel hunger from say… 10am to
260.
by zionic 4y ago
Thus further evidence of neurolinguistic programming being real (or people believing it’s real). Shape the language people are allowed to use and you start to shape their thoughts as well.
261.
by zionic 4y ago
I’m just gonna leave this here: https://i.redd.it/wqld5v9s5ln81.jpg
262.
by zionic 4y ago
> We're sure it's in a List, but the point is that the List is not uniformly enforced The fact that it’s in a list at all should make you reconsider your employment with them. The inmates run the asylum at Google, just because
263.
by zionic 4y ago
Not going to dox myself via sharing their @. It's banned now so you can't see it anyways. They were attacked by some pitbull advocacy club and likely mass-reported. The replies were full of people saying things like "this is
264.
by zionic 4y ago
These all seem like problems we can solve via genetic engineering. Our bodies should produce immune system cells capable of fighting off any foreign organism, be that on our skin or in our mouths. We’re still so far from a complete understa
265.
by zionic 4y ago
He had verbal commitment from someone who claimed (and he believed) to have final authority to execute the deal.
266.
by zionic 4y ago
> why were those accounts banned? Twitter is/was a ban happy shithole. It is absolutely trivial to get banned on Twitter. My favorite example is someone I know getting banned for posting pitbull fatality statistics. They were banned
267.
by zionic 4y ago
Elon nailed it here
268.
by zionic 4y ago
> Do we really want these platforms to have so much unaccountable control over the discourse? Funny how this is suddenly a problem when Elon tries to buy. I agree in principle, but the bias on display is overwhelming.
269.
by zionic 4y ago
Similar boat minus the last part. Never had a Twitter, but I’ll join as paying member if Elon buys it.
270.
by zionic 4y ago
>good bacteria I’ve seen evidence for this in the gut, WRT digestion and such. What possible basis could exist for there being “good” bacteria in your mouth? It’s still going to do damage even if it doesn’t offgas sulfur. Long term I ima

More ›