ziddoap

14 ms·

211.
by ziddoap 2y ago
" [...] national security is widely understood to include also non-military dimensions, such as the security from terrorism, minimization of crime, economic security, energy security, environmental security, food security, and cyber-se
212.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It is as if some people hit a certain age and just want the entire world to stop evolving around them so that they can remain comfortable. "Those damn kids and their newfangled words with context/nuance I don't understand!&qu
213.
by ziddoap 2y ago
This comment, and the fact that you had to make this point twice (three times actually!) in this thread, is some real "old man yells at cloud" energy. There is nuance to the term that "avatar" doesn't remotely captu
214.
by ziddoap 2y ago
That last video was pretty interesting with the side-by-side, showing how things are re-calibrated, etc. I figured that being a vtuber wasn't cheap, but that's a lot of (expensive looking) gear on top of the cost of the software,
215.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It's not cracking in the sense of a mathematical breaking of the underlying crypto. It's cracking in the sense of like, hashcat. Using wordlists, common passwords, common patterns (1 on the end, substituting a with @, i with !, et
216.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It generally gets flagged, but there's definitely been some bad comments. I don't think that what I've seen, if directed at me, would get the same response -- but I obviously don't see it all, nor have it directed at me,
217.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I don't know why I'm bothering. But notice how all of these explicitly mention accuracy? And how they are benchmarking the accuracy of the LLM against a known dataset? How accuracy is the primary metric they are evaluated on? Mayb
218.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> No, they generally do not compete on accuracy benchmarks afaik. "Get Answers" is literally at the top of ChatGPTs landing page. You think the average person interprets that to mean "Get inaccurate answers"? Google
219.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> The daydream machine then daydreamed some output text, as is it's function. These are not advertised as daydream machines. They compete on how accurate they they are against various accuracy benchmarks. The average person who use
220.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> is it libel if I tell you that I had a dream about you, where you killed a guy? This isn't even closely analogous. I don't know if you could come up with a more bad faith argument. This was outputting a lie, presented as a
221.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> LLM's hallucinate. They just do. Would you be okay if LLMs start responding that you murdered or diddled your kids when responding to "who is crazygringo" queries? Hallucinating about a cookie recipe or whatever is one
222.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> What does Noyb hope to achieve with such lawsuits? Ensure that innocent people don't have malicious garbage about them spat out of a machine that other people blindly trust, probably.
223.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Does that justify the two weeks of detainment in a for-profit prison?
224.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Just to clarify, parent poster asked about visiting the US but it appears your comment is about visiting Canada. Are you a US citizen that was visiting Canada, or did I misread your comment?
225.
by ziddoap 2y ago
I'm familiar with the theory of simulated universes, though I appreciate the explanation, I am just having trouble connecting why an oxygen discovery in a distant galaxy would increase the probability of the theory.
226.
by ziddoap 2y ago
How/why does this result increase that specific probability?
227.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Which organizations are willing to take on that burden (time, expenses, stress, etc.) for free, with no guarantee that they will win? There is not really any incentive or reward for 3rd-party organizations to step in and do this.
228.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Even if the lawyer services are provided pro-bono, it is still a large time commitment and added stress for the non-lawyer people involved for cases that aren't guaranteed to win.
229.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Yes there are downsides to this idea but I'd like people to have real conversations around those rather than throw the baby out with the bath water. It's hard to have a serious conversation when you present a couple of upsid
230.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Copyright the content and sue those who use it for AI training. This costs money, time, and ongoing commitment. FOSS isn't typically known for being overflowing with cash.
231.
by ziddoap 2y ago
The monetary value is not having a misbehaving AI bot download 73TB or whatever of your data.
232.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> No corporation has the right or ability to promise privacy to any free persons in a free society. I thought that was assumed on a site like Hacker News. You're back to arguing against your own imagination.
233.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Privacy is not solved by trusting one corporation's service over another, either. I didn't say it was. > Apple cannot exercise private entitlements to deny competitors fair access to their features. I didn't say the
234.
by ziddoap 2y ago
You said: > That sounds like an implementation issue that can be solved by Apple securing their runtime and APIs. In response to someone saying privacy of users needs to be protected. Privacy isn't solved by implementing a secure A
235.
by ziddoap 2y ago
Security and privacy are two different concepts. Securing an API has no impact on whether the data being provided via that API is private or not.
236.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> Even MS has in their FAQ: Are "Q: passkeys phishing resistant? A: Yes, passkeys are phishing resistant" [1] Phishing resistant is different than phishing proof. Passkeys remain phishing resistant, even in light of such an at
237.
by ziddoap 2y ago
If your only comment is dissuading people from taking the content of the article seriously (oh, and lying by saying the content is still available!), you are leaving a political comment. But, okay!
238.
by ziddoap 2y ago
It's crazy to me that you seem more angry about a headline than the fact that 4 years of public government data was deleted. To answer your question, your hypothetical title would have me feeling exactly the same as I do now: angry tha
239.
by ziddoap 2y ago
The fact that they deleted everything over a 4 year period instead of just a subset made you less angry? Would you mind explaining why?
240.
by ziddoap 2y ago
> I am censoring it to protect myself from repercussions. You might not be paying attention... Just a note that if everyone here knows you mean Israel when you type "Isra-l" (and Jewish when you type "Jewi-sh"), so d

More ›