3 ms·
The fact that they deleted everything over a 4 year period instead of just a subset made you less angry? Would you mind explaining why?
by ziddoap 2y ago
The fact that they deleted everything over a 4 year period instead of just a subset made you less angry?
Would you mind explaining why?
- fn-mote 2y agoBecause it's not particularly targeted to benefit certain companies.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoIt benefits companies who broke the rules more.
- _--__--__ 2y agoWhat if the article was titled __FTC Removes Posts Critical of Kroger, Albertsons__? That is an alternative that is as accurate as the current one and sends a very different message. Telling a selective subset of the truth is just a barely clever form of lying.
- ziddoap 2y agoIt's crazy to me that you seem more angry about a headline than the fact that 4 years of public government data was deleted. To answer your question, your hypothetical title would have me feeling exactly the same as I do now: angry that the data was deleted.
- _--__--__ 2y agoI never commented on the subject of the article because I don't come here to engage in political flamewars. I will continue not to comment on it, but rest assured that you have absolutely no idea what I am angry about. Having engagement driven clickbait on the front page is bad for the entire site.
- ziddoap 2y agoIf your only comment is dissuading people from taking the content of the article seriously (oh, and lying by saying the content is still available!), you are leaving a political comment. But, okay!