zhiel

5 ms·

1.
by zhiel 5y ago
I have no idea who you are or how closely have you been following the ecosystem of languages, but like what? What you just said is what languages do
2.
by zhiel 5y ago
Now imagine if the WASM folks had all the bundler/dead code elimination/link time optimization..., its coming, sorta...
3.
by zhiel 5y ago
In my opinion, this is the way forward. You cannot convince anyone that does frontend stuff to even try, or EVEN switch to this. We have to prove that this is a viable option, WASM is a viable way, WASM is actually more efficient etc. there
4.
by zhiel 5y ago
You would never want to understand why this is better? Here is a couple of reasons: 1. It is backed up by a statically typed, safe, elegant language that is like a strict teacher that tells you to fuck off when you make a mistake... 2. HMR
5.
by zhiel 5y ago
Why not? WASM is gaining features after it's MVP, such as GC support, direct targeting with DOM APIs (with reference types and interface types), it's not a fast process, but it's coming. It doesn't take anything away fro
6.
by zhiel 5y ago
If anyone is curious about Seed, here is my example project for pushing it sorta to a limit: https://rsfractal.herokuapp.com/ It doesn't really test Seed, but I guess Seed just works?! :shrug:
7.
by zhiel 5y ago
Not affiliated, but an alternative to Seed or Yew is a new lib: https://github.com/sycamore-rs/sycamore AFAIK Seed and Yew target the VDOM stuff which has always been an unnecessary overhead, Sycamore does what Svelte
8.
by zhiel 5y ago
This is not a fever dream in my opinion, just replace Rust with your favorite language if that language targets WASM. Eventually, JS will be just another choice in a field of languages that would target WASM... then it is just a matter of p
9.
by zhiel 5y ago
They are pretty much identical. Seed has better docs, Yew has a promise for multi-threaded stuff, but its not very well documented (or even working). I've tried projects with both and the nice thing with Yew is that the syntax for HTML
10.
Swift, definition of version 1.0 and ABI stability
1 points by zhiel 11y ago|2 comments
11.
by zhiel 14y ago
The basic flaw in the Unix philosophy is that the rules 1. and 2. are incorrect. The rules should be as follows: 1. Write libraries that do one thing and do it well. 2. Write libraries to work together. The third rule is correct, because th
12.
by zhiel 15y ago
Then your assumption would be wrong. I consider myself to be more artistic in writing my code. But thats besides the point I was trying to make. While I enjoy the feeling of creation and I like doing fancy stuff on my computer, I still reco
13.
The Future Of Programming?
16 points by zhiel 15y ago|7 comments
14.
by zhiel 16y ago
I'm so appalled by the design of this site that I'm not going to read this, although the topic is interesting...