zeptonix

10 ms·

61.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Sure, because these numbers are guaranteed to be 100% accurate and no one would have any interest in under-counting them.
62.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Responding to myself, but I also think a "why did I lose?" / "where did I first go wrong?" variation would be super popular with people.
63.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Amazing, incredible idea. Run with it for a bit. Setup a hosted, super easy to use version, that's billed ultimately at cost plus but in an easy to understand way (maybe # of games, that sort of thing).
64.
by zeptonix 5y ago
This might be helpful for some context: "Affecting approximately 2 to 5 percent of the population, hypochondria has no specific cause, but is often found in people who have had previous experience with a serious illness, especially in
65.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Sending an upvote before all the downvotes come piling in...
66.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Right, stocks [which are just proxies for companies] are completely random because of <random bs paper from E. Fama from 51 years ago>. Because, of course, how would it ever be possible to predict how a company might perform? That mus
67.
by zeptonix 5y ago
the name could even be catchy ... CryptoFish
68.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Tesseract sucked for me. Had a simple use case where I was trying to read numbers (in a computer font) from .png files and at completely predictable locations in the image -- and Tesseract was getting it horribly wrong a huge percent of the
69.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Really having trouble getting the unrelenting hatred here on this site for something that's fundamentally new, clearly represents progress, and is obviously a trend that's here to stay. <CrazyIdea>Maybe the laws, licensing,
70.
by zeptonix 5y ago
The tone of the responses here is absurd. Guys, be grateful for some progress. Instead of having to retype boilerplate code, your productivity is now enhanced by having a system that can do it for you. This is primarily about reducing the n
71.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Sure, let's transform everything into an endless abyss of "this is now deprecated" popup/console warnings. Just like we did with cookie popups. So we have more browsers that all support different things and partially sup
72.
by zeptonix 5y ago
Seems like they could have made some different design decisions to make the input a lot more readable. Also IMHO code generation should be a last-resort anti-pattern; after all that's what you (the programmer with a brain) are for.
73.
by zeptonix 5y ago
The preferences page itself should have a modal popup requiring the user to accept the website's terms prior to using the preferences page.
74.
by zeptonix 6y ago
What are you trying to trade that has a bid of (near) $0 and ask of $5? Most stocks are generally way more liquid. Also you'll find you can get hit at/near the midpoint even when the bid/ask spread is large. (Which makes sens
75.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Absolutely amazing!
76.
by zeptonix 6y ago
... and not everything is BSD
77.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Nonsense. /etc is for important system stuff. libexec is BSD specific and btw not everything is BSD.
78.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Yeah, it is. I'm having a really hard time understanding this "I need types forced down my throat" and "I like typing 3x as much as I would otherwise need to" and "yes, I want half my screen obscured by the typ
79.
by zeptonix 6y ago
That's only about 7 monitor stands, could be worse /s
80.
by zeptonix 6y ago
The developers have a lot more risks (the product never gets built, the product at its end isn't compelling, the founder moves on to something else and/or there never is any follow-through). The marketers are being asked to help t
81.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Fantastic example of everything not to do. People seem to forget languages are meant for humans to actually write in and be productive in. I think there tends to be this idea that if you make a language constrained/annoying enough to w
82.
by zeptonix 6y ago
I think I'd have about three "UserInterface"'s in me before going crazy over why they didn't just name it "UI"
83.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Right, rather than managing your own server with a known interface and familiar commands, you get the pleasure of managing everything through a single bloated configuration file typically with very poor documentation.
84.
by zeptonix 6y ago
That was my conclusion after getting all excited about serverless initially. I was seeing lower latency, no coldstart concerns, and easier log access/ability to debug just by going back to having a server. Plus having your entire deplo
85.
by zeptonix 6y ago
Any chance of getting individual trades / more detailed data up? What kind of underlying data sources are there for this stuff?