zenopopovici

4 ms·

1.
by zenopopovici 6y ago
Yep.
2.
by zenopopovici 6y ago
Apple actually handled my situation a lot better and didn’t block me. I am the original author.
3.
by zenopopovici 6y ago
I did. It’s avaliable for Safari. https://apps.graffino.com I’m the original author. It happens a while back ago though. I never developed for Chrome again.
4.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
Actually no. The same extension is OK in the Safari store by using "Cleaner - For Facebook". This is OK according to the law. I didn't get the clear reasons my extension was taken down. It is a grand leap to what needs to be
5.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
It doesn't really matter if you agree with me or not. To say that Google inaction or non-communication is fair or good or OK is simply out of this world. I specifically said in the article that it's not the takedown I had a proble
6.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
It's not opensource. I would have to rewrite it to open source it. And write some docs. I don't know if I have the time for it. I can't release it in the form it is now. I'm really ashamed of the code I wrote a few years
7.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I have a reasonable argument, but you're not listening. So I'm just going to stop writing. If you're a developer there needs to be an explanation and a mediation if a conflict occurs. This is how business is handled everywher
8.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I think you confused the mails ... it's not.
9.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
Why won't it solve any copyright claims against it? It did in the Safari Extensions Gallery ... It's quite easy to make required changes when the rules are clear and communication exists.
10.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I'm not entitled for support when I'm developing for their platform ... and I'm supposed to be a sightseer 4 years in the future.. I'm gonna stop right there...
11.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
But it's not why it was taken down ... :)
12.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I would gladly pay for developer support. I do it for Apple. (I'm the original author).
13.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
They told me I was infringing 4 years later... when there are numerous apps in the store doing the same. It's also a cleaner that works only of Facebook. Google reviewed it and approved it 4 years ago. The extension is free. There is n
14.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
So they told me I was infringing 4 years later... when there are numerous apps in the store doing the same. It's also a cleaner that works only of Facebook. Google reviewed it and approved it 4 years ago. The extension is free. There i
15.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
You got it wrong. I was never told what to do or how to change it so that my users would still recognize it. Also changing its name in this way was suggested (and accepted) for the Safari extension by the Safari Gallery Team. If I don'
16.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I know. I'm so evil...:)
17.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
4 years later... it's a cleaner that works only of Facebook. It's not a lure or anything. Google reviewed it and approved it 4 years ago. The extension is free. There is no advertising. I don't make any profit. (I'm the
18.
by zenopopovici 10y ago
I'm really surprised this got so much traction..., I didn't submit this to HN. Baffled that so many users went trough roughly the same experience. (I'm the original author)