zemo

33 ms·

301.
by zemo 5y ago
that's a much more reasonable question and would be a reasonable response, but OP decided that instead of asking that question, he's rather provoke repl.it. If they had no leverage before, asking what leverage isn't going to
302.
by zemo 5y ago
it feels like you're intentionally missing the point here. If repl.it is acting as if they believe they have legal leverage, why respond by giving them more leverage?
303.
by zemo 5y ago
are you suggesting that publishing evidence against you is a bad idea on reddit but not a bad idea here? Or is your gripe that he said "chief"? That seems like focusing on the wrong thing entirely.
304.
by zemo 5y ago
so they said "we're gonna talk to some lawyers" and your response is to write a lengthy public blog post without any legal counsel, in which you publish private correspondence along with the other person's contact info w
305.
by zemo 5y ago
except that's not at all the case for two key reasons, and possibly more: for one thing, the core of your argument relies on the assumption that participants should be able to tell , but the only way to separate information from disin
306.
by zemo 5y ago
> I don't know who you think "hn considers to be its audience" but the correct answer is: anyone with intellectual curiosity. That's what the HN organizers think it is and want it to be, but I don't think it&#x27
307.
by zemo 5y ago
> I think it's also our responsibility as commentors to provide civil counter arguments so that other readers are able to see both sides of whatever topic is being discussed while not being pre-disposed to either angle. it literally
308.
by zemo 5y ago
it's really pretty simple: caring more about politeness than about the core of people's arguments is both intellectually dishonest and endemic on this site.
309.
by zemo 5y ago
because if you have one party that is nice and polite and uses proper decorum and they are actively doing harm to another party, and that other party is upset because harm was done to them, and your response is "I will listen to the pe
310.
by zemo 5y ago
right, HN only cares about conforming to protocols. If you conform to the social protocol, you can advocate for the most horrible of positions on this site.
311.
by zemo 5y ago
> the difference is on hn, shitposting, trolling and straight up being offensive is strongly discouraged. you can be deeply offensive on hn if who you are offending is people outside of what hn considers to be its own audience. hn poster
312.
by zemo 5y ago
in the top right of the timeline there's a button whose icon looks like a few sparkles. Hit that and switch your feed from "Home" to "Latest Tweets" and you'll only ever see tweets form people you follow, liste
313.
by zemo 5y ago
> you cannot monetize engagement if your community is highly toxic you're soooooooo close to getting it, but so far. monetizing engagement -creates- toxic communities, because toxicity is engaging.
314.
by zemo 5y ago
Perforce is pretty standard. Plastic SCM has a handful of enthusiastic users but Perforce is more common. Some studios use SVN because they can self-host it and managing art assets in git is really painful.
315.
by zemo 5y ago
most game studios don't use git to manage their games. It's becoming more common but it is by no means a standard in games. The git integration in UE4 is very, very bad. It uses perforce terminology to describe git concepts, often
316.
by zemo 5y ago
all I wanted to see was the new UI and they show it, so I'm glad. Definitely looks like they took some inspiration from the Blender 2.8 UI. It looks really nice.
317.
by zemo 5y ago
out of bounds panics aren’t all that common in practice. Yeah they’re easy to write, but usually if you have a slice you’re going to range over the whole thing or loop over it up to its length anyway. It’s not common to handle slice indexes
318.
by zemo 5y ago
have you ever actually maintained production Go systems or are you just saying things based on assumptions
319.
by zemo 5y ago
there was another thread where people were like "gamedevs make less money because they're exploited nincompoops and don't know how to negotiate" or other i-am-an-alien-studying-humanity-at-a-distance comments like "
320.
by zemo 5y ago
Etsy users put things in their cart to bookmark them. I haven't been there for six years now, but one of the problems I worked on at Etsy was getting people to stop using their cart as a bookmarking tool. While I was there I worked on
321.
by zemo 5y ago
accepting everything uncritically and not recognizing when things are actually exploitative and harmful to the people that use them is not wisdom, it's naivety. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
322.
by zemo 5y ago
it's not at all shocking, you're just seeing Paul G for who he is for the first time.
323.
by zemo 5y ago
it's got Google Drive integration too. I use it and put all the diagrams into a Google Drive folder.
324.
by zemo 6y ago
you know about rerere right? https://www.git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rerere
325.
by zemo 6y ago
this is like asking if exercise saps the fitness potential of humanity
326.
by zemo 6y ago
clicked through to this not expecting anything new, didn't find anything new, this stuff is all obvious and should be clear to everyone. Clicked through to see the comments and ... the amount of pushback in the comments is very weird.
327.
by zemo 6y ago
> "Build Consensus" - hah, the words of an org chart climber. ^ the words of a person that builds things that nobody asked for and then gets mad when people don't use them.
328.
by zemo 6y ago
this piece says more than the entirety of beeple's output https://rarible.com/token/0x60f80121c31a0d46b5279700f9df7860...
329.
by zemo 6y ago
maybe it could work, but in practice it's often not as easy as you'd like it to be. disconnecting everyone at or around the same time simultaneously can easily create a thundering herd or a TCP global synchronization problem, so &
330.
by zemo 6y ago
being open-source is not a magical shield against criticism

More ›