zekrioca

9 ms·

91.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Could you list some of these downsides and what are the reason of their existence?
92.
by zekrioca 1y ago
https://www.tesla.com/megapack
93.
by zekrioca 1y ago
https://www.tesla.com/megapack
94.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Clever use of the adjective “cleaner”. Try replacing it with “less dirty, but still pollutant and toxic” to see an alternative, correct version of what you have written.
95.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Solar panels can now last as far as 30 years.
96.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Solved problem? Have you ever waited 10000 years to see if the waste really decomposes and the area where it was stored is safe for kids to play?
97.
by zekrioca 1y ago
They are easily recyclable. Nuclear isn’t, unless of course you have a 24/7 protected and monitored by 100’s of people storage place to keep all that safe for the next 10000 years. Very ‘cheap’ indeed.
98.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Nuclear by itself isn’t either. A balanced mix is needed.
99.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Have you ever heard of batteries?
100.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Would ge possible to install a small Clipper LTE 4G Breakout (SP/CE) into this design? For instance, there is this one which seem small enough to fit in the case (if adaptions): https://shop.pimoroni.com/products/c
101.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05276v1
102.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Would this multiplayer work on Postgresql?
103.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Almost everything you wrote is incorrect, which is why you don’t provide sources for anything. And in the end, the cherry: “yes, the world is ending, so what can we do? I guess nothing, let’s just continue burning it so it dies faster.”
104.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Interesting, if GPUS/ASICS have been improving in energy efficiency, then why is it that total consumption has been exponentially increasing?
105.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Nuclear proliferation.
106.
by zekrioca 1y ago
> Storage is extremely expensive. No.
107.
Google removes net-zero carbon goal amid power-hungry AI datacenter buildout(tomshardware.com)
2 points by zekrioca 1y ago|0 comments
108.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Sure, but this should have been included in the article, not here.
109.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Author listed RDF a couple dozen of times but didn’t define it, so: The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a standard model for data interchange on the web, designed to represent interconnected data using a structure of subject-predica
110.
by zekrioca 1y ago
There are products already that do this: https://www.originwirelessai.com/
111.
Climate Experts' Review of the DOE Climate Working Group Report(sites.google.com)
2 points by zekrioca 1y ago|0 comments
112.
by zekrioca 1y ago
I noticed exactly the same thing. The author is saying something that has been repeatedly written in queueing theory books for decades, still they are noticing this only now.
113.
by zekrioca 1y ago
It is very hard to argue when you think electricity != energy, and you cannot even see that EV displaces the use of fossil fuels (I.e., a type of primary energy), even when you yourself wrote that it consumes less energy lol Solar panels in
114.
by zekrioca 1y ago
> Electrification doesn't displace demand. It adds more demand. Take cars, for instance. When someone buys an EV rather than ICE, do you think the EV uses the same amount of energy than the ICE car? > what you described with dema
115.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Cool article, empty conclusions.
116.
by zekrioca 1y ago
(I) Electrification displaces energy demand. Efficiency controls growth of demand. Various limits have been reached with efficiency. (II) Demand response is not about “do not use power because we don’t have enough.”, it is about “here is so
117.
by zekrioca 1y ago
They have lots potential for wind (~20%) and hydro. Peak demand is increasing, but lasts for very specific amounts of time during a day, it doesn’t justify the increases in base load. These peaks could be certainly fulfilled by smarter grid
118.
by zekrioca 1y ago
What about the energy that we spent to read this stupid, one-sided argument? Will we ever get it back? I mean, you said yourself you are not oil-funded, so perhaps you are being scammed, because you are doing their job for free.
119.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Your arguments are not coming from evidence, but from emotions. You clearly want politics as usual, with investments in a very expensive theoretical “one size fits all”, or all eggs in one nest types of solutions. You don’t even list the pr
120.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Nordics (Sweden, Finland) are expanding nuclear as well. Their energy ministers are very pro-nuclear, for some funny reason.

More ›