zekrioca

10 ms·

121.
by zekrioca 1y ago
> I said I don't know. I said had heard the argument and these are better arguments against wind IMO if they are true. > I don't know what to believe. I am dubious of any reporting on these issues. The person didn’t ask if y
122.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Other than Lisp, is it possible to do this in other languages?
123.
by zekrioca 1y ago
> The best way forward, factoring in current and future energy use, is nuclear. They have wrote it, just read it in "0.5x" mode rather than "2x".
124.
by zekrioca 1y ago
That person you are arguing with is not arguing with you in good faith. They are in the "base load" camp, despite knowing full well we need an "all of the above" approach. The subsidies that both nuclear and fossil fuel
125.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Impressive that they just talk talk talk and do not link to the original study.
126.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Measurements for water consumption seems cherry-picked and incorrect to look better than they actually are. When asked about it, they doubled-down and incorrectly mentioned the study in question (to which they compared against) was incorrec
127.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Measurements for water consumption seems cherry-picked and incorrect to look better than they actually are. When asked about it, they doubled-down and incorrectly mentioned the study in question (to which they compared against) was incorrec
128.
by zekrioca 1y ago
It is called ‘transition’, and it stopped increasing. If one looks at 2025 preliminary data, one can see it has flattened out, continuing with the 2024 trend.
129.
Ex-Google exec says law, medicine are waste, AI will catch up by graduation(fortune.com)
3 points by zekrioca 1y ago|3 comments
130.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Data seems cherry-picked. See https://www.linkedin.com/posts/shaolei-ren-68557415_today-go...
131.
by zekrioca 1y ago
It seems to me the issue is not really setting up and building around K8s as an infrastructure orchestrator, afterall k8s sells itself as a cluster API which is the de facto standard nowadays. The issue starts when you need to handle very s
132.
by zekrioca 1y ago
"The financial specifics of the deal have not been released."
133.
by zekrioca 1y ago
My exact same thought.
134.
Trump team pushes for ouster of top IEA official(eenews.net)
5 points by zekrioca 1y ago|0 comments
135.
by zekrioca 1y ago
"Only idiots answer a question with another question."
136.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Please, let us know what happened, I got curious! :)
137.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Why did they type “$5o0”? This doesn’t look like a mistake.
138.
by zekrioca 1y ago
True, and I can only imagine the types of tiered pricing that no one will understand.
139.
by zekrioca 1y ago
By increasing its price?
140.
by zekrioca 1y ago
It is one of the side effects in terms of costs that a country has in order to enable the safe flow of global trade.
141.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Sorry, @OP, not you :) Yes, there will be. But the point is that potentially, all of these GPUs will be at 100% at all times, which makes the 1 000 000 realistic.
142.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Who would pay for that? Should agriculture receive even more subsidies on top of the subsidies that nuclear power plants already receive?
143.
by zekrioca 1y ago
What use cases in agriculture are you referring to? I do not see space or weight being issues. Just see what happens to corn and ethanol.
144.
by zekrioca 1y ago
I guess you should just walk outside a bit.
145.
by zekrioca 1y ago
It is not a drop in the bucket when we are talking about a factor of 1000000 (and not 100 as your initially calculated), on par with buildings and transportation, only behind agriculture.
146.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Not sure what you think demand is, but operators are building 10 GW AI datacenters. Assuming a GPU consumes ~1 kW, the number is potentially (upper bound) 10 GW / 1 kW, way larger than ‘1000’. For one company.
147.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Should we set nuclear facilities all over the country?
148.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Which is what is happening right now.
149.
by zekrioca 1y ago
Batteries.
150.
by zekrioca 1y ago
> Quite a lot. Let's assume a hundred different LLMs of this scale are being trained at the same time. It won’t be 100, you are underestimating it to make the number be small, ignoring the fact that people are talking about GW worth

More ›