zb3

44 ms·

871.
by zb3 3y ago
I don't see a problem with them. Can't we focus on more important (I mean actual) problems?
872.
by zb3 3y ago
Forbes can write that crap, but the problem is with people who make decisions basing on that. I wonder who are these people that care about all this nonsense.
873.
by zb3 3y ago
Articles like this are also harmful, prompting companies to lock down their powerful models even further, while spammers could achieve their goal using simpler, open source models.
874.
by zb3 3y ago
There are two separate problems - the first one is to make sure others don't have the access you don't want them to, while the other is to make sure that you/others have the authorized access. SIM swapping means someone else
875.
by zb3 3y ago
Any form of authentication based on "something you have, but can also lose" is fundamentally broken. Either I'll lose access if I lose the device, or their superior security doesn't matter because the weakest link has to
876.
by zb3 3y ago
Is there a list of these domains?
877.
by zb3 3y ago
I hope they succeed, that would be beneficial for my mental health, productivity and happiness.
878.
by zb3 3y ago
I see nothing wrong with that.
879.
by zb3 3y ago
So now instead of sending the data to OpenAI we send it to Cape? I know that you "promise to keep it secure", but I can only trust you, right? Something like this should IMO be done on-premise
880.
by zb3 3y ago
Ah, apologies, I didn't understand your comment.
881.
by zb3 3y ago
Does that disqualify their problems? I don't get your sentiment.
882.
by zb3 3y ago
I can't as I was not granted access to that (I filled the form).
883.
by zb3 3y ago
Hey Google, what about finally giving me the access to MusicLM?
884.
by zb3 3y ago
So the reason for not using RHEL everywhere is the pricing model? I wonder whether it'd be possible for RH to optimize it so that choosing RHEL 'd still be the best option for them now that CentOS doesn't provide the same lev
885.
by zb3 3y ago
To me it sounds like the pricing model is not optimal. I guess in these situations, they could pay RH "a bit more" in exchange for a legal RHEL license covering those extra nodes. But if there was no such offer then it sounds like
886.
by zb3 3y ago
> In the end less people would be using their kind of Enterprise Linux, which in turn will result in less conversion to the paid version of it. Why would anyone want to convert to the paid version if their use case is covered by the free
887.
by zb3 3y ago
Why should Red Hat provide its main product (stability, compatibility, support) for free? Why are enterprise users so entitled? Why should Red Hat care about them at all?
888.
by zb3 3y ago
I'm an individual freeloader, but I occasionally report bugs. I understand that I might encounter bugs and/or provide some free contributions to Red Hat, but that's in exchange for a well functioning desktop distribution. Now
889.
by zb3 3y ago
As a Fedora user, I like this. People who want to use RHEL should pay and there should be no way around that so I can use my Fedora for free. Good job!
890.
by zb3 3y ago
Yes, I know - my method isn't perfect. But at the same time I don't want to rely on some "irreversible" purely technical solutions to the complex problem of (human) authentication.
891.
by zb3 3y ago
Yes, that's true, but it's not an argument in favor of authentication based on something I have . I don't think we can prevent everything, but I at least want there to be some way to undo the damage (things like courts, char
892.
by zb3 3y ago
I don't want to authenticate using something I have , because I won't be able to authenticate if I lose that thing. Phone number is something I legally own and this ownership can be enforced because I can get a new SIM card with
893.
by zb3 3y ago
Let's wait for another leak then.
894.
by zb3 3y ago
History repeats itself: https://www.simplehtmlguide.com/pagetransitions.php
895.
by zb3 3y ago
> to check as you do the importation of coal, iron, cheese, and goods of foreign manufacture, merely because and even in proportion as their price approaches zero, while at the same time you freely admit, and without limitation, the ligh
896.
by zb3 3y ago
I remember that too and I wish it could stay that way. But today when someone not familiar with technology mentions "crypto", it unfortunately means "cryptocurrencies". And those are only useful for fraud.
897.
by zb3 3y ago
That's simple - "crypto" most likely means "fraud".
898.
by zb3 3y ago
I'm sorry, but what should just. be a _progressive enhancement_ in this case completely ruins the user experience for me. However, I'm probably not your target audience, I'm just commenting on this trend in general.
899.
by zb3 3y ago
If I have 2 devices, your solution still makes me depend on not losing both of them and so on. I don't want to depend on me not losing them (for example in a fire).
900.
by zb3 3y ago
I'm pretty sure you're doing this already. We have courts for a reason, technocracy is a step backwards.

More ›