zaphar

10 ms·

181.
by zaphar 1y ago
It was my understanding that battery fires don't go out because they are basically self fueling. You would be better served having a way to contain it until it burned itself out.
182.
by zaphar 1y ago
Sometimes I think sockets with a spec for what's on the "wire" is about as good an abstraction as you can get for arbitrary cross-language calling. If you could have your perfect abstraction for cross-language calling what wo
183.
by zaphar 1y ago
The distinction between them and religion is that religion is free to say that those axioms are a matter of faith and treat them as such. Rationalists are not as free to do so.
184.
by zaphar 1y ago
> WSDL being language-agnostic ensures that bindings in different languages, and/on the client vs the server side, are consistent with each other. In theory. In reality java could talk to java. M$ stuff could talk to other M$ stuff.
185.
by zaphar 1y ago
To answer your serious questions, gRPC is actually not a bad choice if you are making at the beginning of your project. Migrating over to it is going to be a challenge if you were using something else because it's pretty opinionated bu
186.
by zaphar 1y ago
So far every single use of mcp's I've seen in the wild is that the response is sent straight to the LLM without doing any validation. Seems reasonable for the Author to expect that when it's exactly what is happening.
187.
by zaphar 1y ago
Granted your soap library probably did the wrong thing there but you could do surprising low memory xml parsing with a sax event based parser. I remember taking the runtime of full dom parsers down from hours to minutes by rewriting them as
188.
by zaphar 1y ago
Me too. I have it mirroring stuff from github too for occasions just like this.
189.
by zaphar 1y ago
Yes it is. you can fork the roslyn compiler and toolchain here: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn It's even an mit license one of the most permissive.
190.
by zaphar 1y ago
This is most attributable to the fact that traffic is essentially anonymous so the source ip address is the best that a service can do if it's trying to protect an endpoint.
191.
by zaphar 1y ago
Reckless endangerment covers the case of pro-riders being idiots. Classification of the vehicle should rely on the vehicle's properties instead of the operators capabilities.
192.
by zaphar 1y ago
It is fully open source so... who cares?
193.
by zaphar 1y ago
Anything on wheels is going to go downhill real fast. Terminal velocity under gravity is not what we use for classifying vehicles because it doesn't serve as a useful bucket because it's not a feature of the average mechanism of p
194.
by zaphar 1y ago
That may be the official technical definition but in practice speed is the real reason for dividing between bicycle and motorcycle and moped. It's also the primary reason we require licenses for some and not for others.
195.
by zaphar 1y ago
That's not an e-bike. That's an electric motorcycle.
196.
by zaphar 1y ago
Those problems are American problems. They are human problems. You see them everywhere not just here.
197.
by zaphar 1y ago
Those interfaces that never got a second implementation were still defining the contract for interacting with another part of your system and that compile time enforced contract provides value. I have plenty of complaints about Spring but i
198.
by zaphar 1y ago
Except that his talk is not anti-OOP. It's anti-a-specific-way of using OOP. Namely representing the Domain Model as the compile time hierarchy. He goes to great lengths that he himself uses OOP concepts in his code. OOP wasn't
199.
by zaphar 1y ago
I am not sure what the link between ECS and protocols, traits, and multiple inheritance is? ECS is mostly about memory layout not typed interfaces as far as I know.
200.
by zaphar 1y ago
What? Since when did CSS become about capturing semantics? That's what the Html elements are for. CSS is about the presentation.
201.
by zaphar 1y ago
The best way to lie is not presenting false facts, it's curating facts to suit your narrative. It's also often that you accidentally lie to yourself or others in this way. See a great many news stories.
202.
by zaphar 1y ago
I don't know how you advocate for such a thing without holding judges to a standard of neutrality and objectivity and acknowledging/celebrating it when it happens.
203.
by zaphar 1y ago
Is your entire position that government doesn't work so we should get rid of it? Or do you have proposals for actual ways to improve it?
204.
by zaphar 1y ago
If that request is a trap then you have basically made my point for me I guess.
205.
by zaphar 1y ago
Can you point to specific examples where the courts interpretation and reasoning wasn't rooted in the law and the arguments from the lawyers in the court specificall? Because I can't. I might disagree with some of the opinions but
206.
by zaphar 1y ago
Then get legislation through congress to change it. The courts are not there to fix legislation unless it is superseded by other higher legal authorities. Such as the constitution national or state. Current legislation gives them corporatio
207.
by zaphar 1y ago
Why do you think the FTC analysis was more accurate than the opposing sides? The judges, of whom there were multiple, were going off of opposing side argumentation not just their own subjective opinion. That's how courts in the US work
208.
by zaphar 1y ago
I agree that article's headline is pretty factual nor are the facts cherry-picked. But "some reporting is biased" is heavily understating the problem. And I hypothesize that the reason there is a leap to "This is biased&
209.
by zaphar 1y ago
I don't think most reporting bias takes the form of incorrect facts. It takes the form of picking which facts to share driven by the facts that matter the most to the particular reporter sharing them. This results in slanted coverage e
210.
by zaphar 1y ago
Perhaps, but I disagree with those views.

More ›