zamjs

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by zamjs 9y ago

   Thank you so much for your feedback! The documentation is a work in progress. The ajax function is a bit of a mess and needs to be reworked. Fetch is most likely the better option unless Promises are incorporated.
2. 2.▲
   by zamjs 9y ago

   I see your points. "Like, is it faster because it uses native dom selection functions?" Yes, this library is fast because it's based around native dom functions. "If that's not the case, what kind of groundbreaking
3. 3.▲
   by zamjs 9y ago

   Thanks for the catch!! Fixed it. I had to explicitly set "left: 0"
4. 4.▲
   by zamjs 9y ago

   From a performance stand point -- does it really matter? You are right. fadeIn and fadeOut should have some optional callback for completion.
5. 5.▲
   by zamjs 9y ago

   Zam's methods are overall document methods. For example: .each() and .addStyle() Things get a little more complex with some of the methods though. For example: .css() Fetch is only faster on certain browsers. I'm thinking about in
6. 6.▲
   Ditch React. Ditch Angular. Go Vanilla with Zam(zamjs.com)

   17 points by zamjs 9y ago|24 comments