Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
zaidf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
541.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Total guess: may be if both "victims" signed off on an agreement(whether it had legal standing or not) it would make it significantly more difficult for the prosecutors to move forward with the criminal case.
542.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
His analysis can still be incorrect. For example, other legal experts may disagree with his interpretation of blah law. This is why I think more, not less, somewhat emotion-free evaluation would be helpful. If we learn the laws are far over
543.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Punishment could be being banned from the MIT network in future. Punishment could be banned from computer use for x days. Punishment could be a severe monetary punishment.
544.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Anyone associated with the DoJ can't see that the DoJ is the problem Why? He is precise in what his post is doing: simply making an evaluation of whether the charges stack up with the law on the books. He neither promises nor tries to eva
545.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Do you think authorities at the state level would be more receptive than at the county level? Because I've been trying at the county and city level and after sending many victims to ring up the investigators, little has come out of it. I al
546.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Probably unlikely in near term given the possibility that Aaron's family may sue the USA.
547.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
3) HIRE A LAWYER. Winning a case against him in civil court for passing a bad check is pretty much guaranteed to spawn a criminal case because you'll have handed the prosecutors their case; they won't have to redirect many resources away f
548.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
To people wondering if prosecutors have a choice, they absolutely do. I was recipient of an NSF check of over $10,000 from a guy with a history of writing bad checks(a criminal offense). It is a clear cut case with ample proof and victims.
549.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
I was referring to sites that find a way to disable tap and hold text selection, intentionally or not.
550.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Couple more super annoying mobile UI patterns that should die: 1. Banner ads in footer that blink every time you scroll the page. The blinking makes me go nuts when reading a longer article. It gets my attention alright but I sure don't ass
551.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
I'm not sure I agree that Apple should try to explain to the users what they did. It is really hard coming up with one message to communicate something to tens of millions of people. The end result is often confusion or panic--both of which
552.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
What you see as "Apple is remotely fiddling", my grandmother likely sees it as "Apple fixed something for me" (if she were to become aware of what they did). Don't assume your perspective or belief is shared by vast majority of users.
553.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Sounds a lot like Charlie Munger's philosophy that he likes to invest in few businesses that let him sit back and relax for a long time instead of constantly having to worry about getting out of a position at a profit.
554.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
that successful apps often provide a new kind of data structure, that makes them suitable for many purposes And I'd argue that that is also a major reason when apps fail: they force people to change their existing ways of thinking and are
555.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
A. Is this something you can work out? Stop right here and define "this" and think about it from many different perspectives. One of the biggest challenges with founder issues from my personal experience and from talking with other founde
556.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Many of the comments here hating on the idea of management teams highlight how blinded we can be as a community. While it may be cool for startups to hate on BigCos, almost all start-up founders aspire at varying degrees to become the very
557.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Unfortunately you are using a definition that is not shared by most people when judging business success in the long haul. It is okay to have your own metrics but it is disingenuous to suggest that your metrics are also the metrics generall
558.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
The word sorry has multiple meanings, including: regrettable or deplorable; unfortunate; sympathy It does not automatically mean to be an apology. In these cases, I am pretty sure users don't see it as one either. I always saw it as mor
559.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Rant: "blabla sucks repeat " Much more than a rant: "here's what not to do if you are a business; why not to do it; how it makes your customers feel and here's a perfect example" This one is squarely the latter.
560.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Great question but dont assume speed of unlocking is what everyone based their decision on. I can tell you my mom would rather use facial recognition than entering a pin even if the latter was faster. She did point out quirks like if her ha
561.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Apple is increasingly making me look stupid, something I couldn't imagine happening when the iPhone first came out. Few days ago I saw a friend of mine unlock her phone using facial recognition. I was amazed. She was surprised at my amazeme
562.
▲
Our Principles Behind Building Products
(www1.toutapp.com)
5 points
by
zaidf
14y ago
|
0 comments
563.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
When a huge percentage of your supposed new design is covered with stock photos of pretty people, it makes it extremely hard to judge objectively . On the other hand, that is a great sales tactic. I always felt it is kind of wrong for desi
564.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Curious: What precise things were problematic? Their disappearing for months? Their not communicating enough? Them royally ignoring practical guidelines from you re: speed, memory etc?
565.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
At some point Google should insert a reference to every user who has signed up on any google property into their google+ user db. At least then we will have one huge news day about how "well" google+ is doing and that will be the end of thi
566.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Isn't Svbtle itself heavily inspired by another theme?
567.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Exactly. No one is denying this isn't a terrible thing. I don't think we have to convince Simple that this can't be happening. And I don't think one major downtime is reason enough to call for their heads as several of the comments imply. A
568.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
You can't build financial software the same way that you build some CRUD site or the latest social fad. No one is arguing that you should be able to do that. And it is kind of insulting to imply that that is how the folks at Simple look a
569.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
you especially should be doing at least as good as the established parties do in the reliability department. Easy to say but I think it is unreasonable to expect a company that is couple years old to have as much reliability as ones who h
570.
▲
by
zaidf
14y ago
Is being unforgiving to new entrants in a typically scary industry the type of behavior that will encourage new competition?
More ›