zaguios

10 ms·

61.
by zaguios 13y ago
It looks really nice, but there might be a problem for someone reading these notes who didn't actually watch startup school. For example in Watsi's section you write "Worst part about being a non-profit: Nobody says NO",
62.
by zaguios 13y ago
I have a question. Since I'm nowhere near the valley and the start-up community in my community might as well be non-existent, I was wondering how I might go about meeting and getting introductions to investors. Not being well connecte
63.
by zaguios 13y ago
He addresses exactly that point with False Premise #2. It really depends on how you use A/B testing, if you only do it to test small incremental changes then yes, you're correct, but there's nothing stopping you from testing
64.
by zaguios 13y ago
I completely agree, his excessive use of "Small Caps" is incredibly annoying since it just looks out of place with the rest of the text. I'm also not a fan of his font choice, rather than picking it to promote readability it
65.
by zaguios 13y ago
If we're getting into semantics this also wouldn't be accurate since someone can earn $59,500. I think most people that earn x0,000 will pick the larger category that they fall into meaning the results should be fairly accurate.
66.
by zaguios 14y ago
Despite what LongAnimals thinks, he brought opponents and upgrades and levels to a dirtbike game in flash which had never been done before. Unless there was a console game or something he copied, then I would call it pretty darn unique. It
67.
by zaguios 14y ago
If all of their other games are flash games like High Vaultage then it makes sense to use the normal sponsorship model. The only other real ways of monetizing in the flash industry include ads and non-exclusive licenses which generally both
68.
by zaguios 14y ago
Are you calling Cyclomaniacs, Burrito Bison, and Kingdom Rush non-innovative or are you saying they're the mechanics that everyone copies? None of those games had original mechanics, but they each added something new to their respective gen
69.
by zaguios 14y ago
The correct way to say it would be there is a 2:1 ratio of content to advertising. By saying 50% of the programming is advertising you are including advertising in what you consider programming, making the statement false. This is still jus