zackees

19 ms·

61.
by zackees 4y ago
As Musk stated on Twitter, Twitter didn’t hand over the bot data and will have to do so in court to prove its point. I see Musk walking paying nothing, or else a settlement with twitter at a lower price.
62.
by zackees 4y ago
Yes, and the media companies exploited it to prevent Nuclear energy thus precipitating the CO2 crisis being reported by the media today.
63.
by zackees 4y ago
Please cite your sources, here's mine: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2020/09/chinas-nuclear-energy-...
64.
by zackees 4y ago
Your repeating opinion of someone with extreme biases for clickbait. This fantasy of forcing musk to buy the company doesn’t exist in any contract. Your asking the court to make up a new contract and enforce it. That’s not how the court wor
65.
by zackees 4y ago
Yes, chernobyl was fairly harmless, just like Fukushima. Wild life in both is thriving despite the fact that the mainstream media said the radiation was so bad nothing would be able to live there. Reality doesn’t back up any of those assert
66.
by zackees 4y ago
It’s only more expensive due to extremely absurd regulation.
67.
by zackees 4y ago
Musk stated that 50% of the users are bots and that Twitter is hiding this. If true, he’s got an out.
68.
by zackees 4y ago
Or… we can just do nuclear, which is SAFER than solar/wind energy, and not have any issues with needing to build giant batteries.
69.
by zackees 4y ago
Why would the court force Elon to buy the company when the remedy in the contract is a one billion payout?
70.
by zackees 4y ago
Growing up in the 90s I was told that marijuana was medicine and non addictive. Today I have a thirty year marijuana habit that I can’t quit and now it’s being linked to the rise of schizophrenia. Does anyone else feel the current topic of
71.
by zackees 4y ago
The most cost effective way is to remove CO2 would be to allow nuclear generators to be built. The free market would do the rest to kill off the petroleum industry.
72.
by zackees 4y ago
If it was really about saving the planet then Nuclear would have been allowed to replace fossil fuel.
73.
by zackees 4y ago
My family member uses Humalog and it's patent expired in 2014 yet it's hundreds of dollars: https://medcitynews.com/2019/03/lilly-to-introduce-lower-pri... The problem is that there isn't competitio
74.
by zackees 4y ago
Dude, you are getting your political news analysis from the AP. Of course they are going to report that gerrymandering hurts democracy and conservatives are to blame. Why don’t you ask Russia Today about whether Russia is a strong and prosp
75.
by zackees 4y ago
It’s wildly known that animal protein is easier to digest. Vegetables have anti nutrients, a class of chemicals designed to make them less edible. It’s one of the main reasons you can’t eat the vegetation around you. Things like gluten are
76.
by zackees 4y ago
Probably because async io generally scales better.
77.
by zackees 4y ago
This isn’t about winning or losing? Then why do representatives say they “won” a race? Winning and losing appears to be the cornerstone of a democracy.
78.
by zackees 4y ago
Someone has to draw the lines. It’s either going to be the representatives which are directly elected by the people or it’s going to be an unelected bureaucrats. Your solution, being the latter, is far far more undemocratic. The framers of
79.
by zackees 4y ago
What you are complaining about is actually the exact tactics of the left, which is to expand their city boundaries so that their dense homogenous voters swing elections in the surrounding districts. When the left does it’s called redistribu
80.
by zackees 4y ago
SF just recalled the Soros funded DA that DECRIMINALIZED theft upto $950. Same blind eye to crime is happening in New York and Chicago.
81.
by zackees 4y ago
> How are they beholden to people if they can disenfranchise people via gerrymandering? Redistricting also ENFRANCHISES people by putting heavily democratic counties together into voting blocks and conservatives into their voting blocks.
82.
by zackees 4y ago
So this effect is caused by more solar wind slamming into the atmosphere at 100’s of km/hr and is so powerful that it’s CAUSING THE ATMOSPHERE TO HEAT UP AND EXPAND? Does the global warming models take this into effect? This seems like
83.
by zackees 4y ago
This has nothing to do with public health.
84.
by zackees 4y ago
Why is it bonkers? It's routinely used in other countries as well, like how Putin came to power: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings The only difference is that I'm asserting that this is
85.
by zackees 4y ago
Time crystals should be called Perpetual resonance waves in a bose-einstein condensate.
86.
by zackees 4y ago
I’ve done this for static-ffmpeg with the added bonus of downloading ffmpeg binaries on first use.
87.
by zackees 4y ago
We live in a surveillance society now. This individual that attacked the school wasn’t operating in stealth: he let his murderious intentions be known on social media. The choice now is whether to believe that law enforcement at the local a
88.
by zackees 4y ago
> Every half educated climate activist knows thay carbon credits are a fraud perpetuates by wallstreet types to pretend they are doing something when they are not. The problem with this statement is that the carbon credits ARE being roll
89.
by zackees 4y ago
It's easier than this, the waste can be burned in the new generators. So building more nuclear would actually fix the nuclear waste problem.
90.
by zackees 4y ago
I understand the need to protect the environment from the destructive effects of farming, which consumes fast areas of land. But an airport? Really?

More ›