z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2 3y ago

   Last visited maybe 10 years ago. Nice to see it is still active and developing, thought it was a static site of the past.
2. 2.▲
   by z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2 5y ago

   In this context, the old lecture on the exponential function of energy consumption comes to mind. Arithmetic, Population and Energy - a talk by Al Bartlett: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O133ppiVnWY
3. 3.▲
   by z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2 6y ago

   Not entierly correct: methane "tails off to about GWP of 28 for a 100-year time frame" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane#Methane_as...
4. 4.▲
   by z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2 6y ago

   On the other hand, if you apply the same standards to everyone, you would have to put many politicians and hospital managers in jail for having closed many remote hospitals.
5. 5.▲
   by z8rHZM8Svhu8hE2 6y ago

   - wind turbines have a 20 years lifespan, after which the blades are buried and forgotten, and will stay there forever Nuclear power plants have a lifespan of about 50 years, after which the reactor and other parts will be radioactive. This