yupper32

10 ms·

61.
by yupper32 4y ago
> Sounds like we wouldn't want you anyways if you have such poor work ethic. Ouch. I knew I saw red flags in your original post. This seals the deal.
62.
by yupper32 4y ago
Yes. Put in the time with me to show you're serious. Otherwise you could mass spam candidates, most of which you don't actually care about.
63.
by yupper32 4y ago
> Have 1-2 interviews with a take home. > fire those that don't perform up to expectations quickly. This attitude is why I haven't been recruited. I have 10 years at big tech and companies expect me to jump ship with the thr
64.
by yupper32 4y ago
> Because the data involved information about people I had to write up a document explaining exactly what I was using the data for, exactly what information I would be collecting and why it was necessary, explain where the data was to be
65.
by yupper32 4y ago
Again, you're getting too deep where you don't need to be. You say "if art becomes a product" while I'm showing you examples from 500 years ago where people were paid to create some of the most famous pieces of art
66.
by yupper32 4y ago
You're asking a lot of deep sounding questions, but at the end of the day they don't matter much. Michelangelo was commissioned to paint the Sistine Chapel. The School of Athens was commissioned by Pope Julius II. You'll find
67.
by yupper32 4y ago
I don't know about Proxima Centauri b, but they'll be spending around 25% of "Cycle 1" (the first 6,000 hours of science) working on exoplanets, don't worry: "Over the coming year, researchers will use spectros
68.
by yupper32 4y ago
> Obviously the manner of the announcement is insignificant compared to the result itself Not really, I'd argue it's just as important. Without solid PR for current projects, future projects get less funding.
69.
by yupper32 4y ago
SF does this already: https://sf.gov/street-crisis-response-team
70.
by yupper32 4y ago
I can dislike them both at the same time.
71.
by yupper32 4y ago
> if a person has just gotten done working for a candidate or someone in office, they should be barred from private industry until they are politically irrelevant. Wait why? There's already such little incentive to get into public s
72.
by yupper32 4y ago
It's also important to realize that the reason Uber and Lyft were able to crush the taxi industry is in part because the taxi industry was absolutely horrible to consumers. The simple act of being able to know what I'm going to be
73.
by yupper32 4y ago
For all we know, maybe a dozen recruiters were laid off during a hiring freeze. Which sucks but says nothing about the job security for the rest of the company or general company health. And for all we know, this person isn't giving th
74.
by yupper32 4y ago
Almost no information here or anywhere else. Any other source? What roles? How many? Edit: 30% of its recruiting team: https://www.wsj.com/articles/twitter-lays-off-third-of-talen...
75.
by yupper32 4y ago
Ok, well it's not going to be solved. So what's your view on it now?
76.
by yupper32 4y ago
> If these cars can't safely navigate their way to the side of the road using local sensors, they are wildly, hilariously unsuited for autonomous operation. You are a lot more confident than me that this isn't the case.
77.
by yupper32 4y ago
> The vast majority of magic tricks are the opposite. The effect is amazing but the method is actually quite mundane. You're probably right about it being the majority, but I'd say a lot of good slight of hand also falls into t
78.
by yupper32 4y ago
> However, the primary problem I see with this approach is that we are simply not politically ready as a species to attempt a global-scale engineering project like that. What's the point of bringing this up? Are you saying that thei
79.
by yupper32 4y ago
I agree that space debris isn't too much of a concern if they have a very large grid of these bubbles. A percentage popping over a decade will be calculated in. But L1 doesn't mean it won't get hit. James Webb has already bee
80.
by yupper32 4y ago
What do you mean you ran out of time? Was this a race?
81.
by yupper32 4y ago
Brake checking is (usually) illegal in the US, albeit hard to prove without a dash cam or witnesses. So no, it's not the case that people trailing too closely is the problem. It's the case of the Tesla requiring, without good reas
82.
by yupper32 4y ago
You and the Tesla aren't the only ones on the road. You can't control people behind you being just close enough to not be able to stop. Or having another person behind the Tesla swerve into you when trying to avoid hitting the Tes
83.
by yupper32 4y ago
If it often brakes hard and late to the point that people think you're brake checking them, then you shouldn't be using it. They don't think you're brake checking them, you ARE brake checking them. Stop being dangerous o
84.
by yupper32 4y ago
Oh jeez, yeah that first site looks like an auto-generated scam/spam website. I'd never enter anything into that website.
85.
by yupper32 4y ago
Most people (including me) think they're better drivers than average. I think I'm probably in the top 10%, at least. Whether or not that's actually true doesn't matter for my argument. All that considered, I need autonom
86.
by yupper32 4y ago
I never understood the need for these frameworks. Every time I try to read into it, it seems to make the assumption that your team are a bunch of children who can't manage their own tasks and escalate issues as they come up. Write up a
87.
by yupper32 4y ago
I like the word "admittedly" there because I read it as it's a dirty little secret of yours, haha.
88.
by yupper32 4y ago
> It doesn't matter to me whether or not they only use the advertising data internally. Okay, but it does matter when you say something significant that isn't true. Do you understand that?
89.
by yupper32 4y ago
> At least they are not selling my data to advertisers That's almost never what actually happens, though. They sell access to you and use your data internally to target ads. A law enforcement request does literally release your data
90.
by yupper32 4y ago
We can barely get people to vote once. Why do you think we could get people to vote twice?

More ›