yunoe

3 ms·

1.
by yunoe 9y ago
Much of the "gig economy" seem to basically be "urban day labor".
2.
by yunoe 9y ago
It's not very appealing to respond when you don't give any reasons. I work with making and maintaining Linux distributions for enterprise, and previously embedded, systems (including desktop). We commission open source work, buy &
3.
by yunoe 9y ago
> Open source might be part of the answer to this, or some kind of legal 'right to migrate'. It isn't. Everyone who tried to decide over which version of a distribution to run should know this. It's fine as long as yo
4.
by yunoe 9y ago
> If someone has a computer hooked to an MRI machine and to the hospital network, and it runs outdated/insecure software then someone made a mistake somewhere. If you want a system to reach 100% it can't rely on not making mist
5.
by yunoe 9y ago
I get what you're saying. I don't like part of the direction Microsoft is taking either. Yet, I don't agree with your perspective. What's happening here is that Microsoft, after a number of years of troubles keeping up,
6.
by yunoe 9y ago
This is a pretty ironic comment though. The article is basically arguing that our views, to a large degree, are based on our previous held ideas and that the way to remedy that is by taking a more complex and serious view of things. And now
7.
by yunoe 9y ago
I think you all are missing the point. As Google gave away Android for free with the support of their brand, services and user base it essentially killed all the alternatives (MeeGo, WebOS, BlackBerry 10) and companies that were focused on
8.
by yunoe 9y ago
They are of course entitled to their feelings, but saying that Spotify was doing something nefarious is unreasonable. Being able to send a receive information is part of how the Internet is supposed to work. That's what's makes it