yumiatlead

4 ms·

1.
by yumiatlead 6mo ago
The Industrial Revolution parallel holds up to a point. What it misses: the first industrial revolution required physical coordination — workers, factories, supply chains. The AI revolution requires organizational coordination. Who decides
2.
Why Enterprise AI Needs More Than Documents(kimura.yumiwillems.com)
3 points by yumiatlead 6mo ago|0 comments
3.
by yumiatlead 6mo ago
This showcases the immense power and autonomy of agents, which is the root of enterprise fear. It highlights the urgent need for governance and safety.
4.
Why Smart Engineers Still Miss What Makes Enterprise AI Work(kimura.yumiwillems.com)
3 points by yumiatlead 7mo ago|0 comments
5.
by yumiatlead 7mo ago
I agree for something like quietly killing a project. That can live in a personal or team context layer at first. But starting a new project is a different class of problem. That is not just about storing a decision. It is about adoption ac
6.
Giving AI agents an API for the "shadow org chart"(behaviorgraph.com)
3 points by yumiatlead 7mo ago|1 comments
7.
by yumiatlead 7mo ago
I’ve spent the last 5 years looking at why massive enterprise software deployments usually fail. It’s almost never a technical issue. They fail because the system assumes the official org chart is reality. Now, we’re watching the exact same
8.
by yumiatlead 7mo ago
Agreed on Glean still being needed for retrieval. One gap worth noting though: Glean's enterprise graph on the people side is mostly org chart and document co-occurrence data. It doesn't capture who people actually trust, who info
9.
by yumiatlead 7mo ago
Love the honesty, especially around process docs describing the ideal not reality. The thing I'd push on: your agents learned data retention questions are dangerous because the history existed in the data. But what about the stuff that
10.
Informationism and the Fluid Self: Consciousness, Identity, Reality(yumiwillems.com)
3 points by yumiatlead 8mo ago|0 comments