yumechii

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by yumechii 1y ago

   Empirical evidence is more robust than anecdotal evidence. Also, a lower "server load" has nothing to do with the system being collectively "a good outcome" that justifies labeling criticism as supporting "the bad g
2. 2.▲
   by yumechii 1y ago

   If your moral framework is supporting a nominally good "solution" with no evidence (where if your evidence that your assertion the solution is "proven"?) is "a good outcome", pointing out the solution is flawed
3. 3.▲
   by yumechii 1y ago

   You criticized what you identified as an "advice" for not providing work to your scope (which you clarified as "make a better thing than Anubis"), why should I suddenly have to meet your scope of "work" to be a
4. 4.▲
   by yumechii 1y ago

   How am I offended? Did I accuse you of anything? I didn't even accuse Anubis of anything. You asked for the work, I post the work and evidence to ground the discussion in "work", as you demanded.
5. 5.▲
   by yumechii 1y ago

   Here are some benchmarks, TLDR is Anubis is not as performant as an optimized client prover running on the same HEDT CPU. So the "PoW tax" essentially only applies to low volume requester who have no incentive to optimize or bespo