yui43

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by yui43 5y ago

   That’s a revelation as mind blowing as noticing people against drugs tend not to consume them. Only crypto folks seem to think skin in the game is a prerequisite for criticism and objective discussion. Do you need to own other humans to for
2. 2.▲
   by yui43 5y ago

   What a weird opinion to hold in a society totally dominated by incentive. Serving yourself is the entire point since we have structured nearly all of human existence around incentive instead of command. Discounting the argument that it
3. 3.▲
   by yui43 5y ago

   You’d have 587 million dogecoin, which is totally useful currency and not a speculative joke named after a meme.
4. 4.▲
   by yui43 5y ago

   > The thing is that "improvements in engineering, materials, process, or design" should make it cheaper, not more expensive. Only if you’re optimizing for cost, which public infrastructure very obviously isn’t. It’s optimizing
5. 5.▲
   by yui43 5y ago

   “Basically the same bridge” is such a hilarious oversimplification that it makes your blame of the Federal Reserve even more amusing. No, absolutely no improvements in engineering, materials, process, or design in sixty years. No added over