yucky

192 ms·

2161.
by yucky 5y ago
Not sure, I suspect the reason the under 30 male cohort was singled out is because the data was only conclusive enough in that cohort. This is pretty recent though, so who knows what we'll see in future months/years.
2162.
by yucky 5y ago
>reduce the 'them' outgroup. Seems like we're happily creating a huge outgroup of "thems" who want to wait until Pfizer concludes long term testing. Especially seeing how many countries in Europe have now stopped
2163.
by yucky 5y ago
So what are your thoughts on the correlation?
2164.
by yucky 5y ago
>makes me believe Ironic :)
2165.
by yucky 5y ago
Is it possible that the people those Senators (including Manchin) represent, aren't interested in a "New Deal" style bill that nobody fully understands?
2166.
by yucky 5y ago
I think you're misunderstanding the point. He claimed to not know he was even in Dallas that day. The only reason it came out is because the records of him checking out of the Dallas Sheraton were later tracked down. So the hotel he wa
2167.
by yucky 5y ago
> is he blaming the slowdown of scientific advancement in the past 40-50 years on "femininity", or straight up just woman? I may have missed it, but I'm not seeing that blame assignment. It does seem a bit ironic that your
2168.
by yucky 5y ago
>To say this was bad .. I don't know if it was bad, but are you saying it was all good? If so, why?
2169.
by yucky 5y ago
> capacity is down because of burnout ...and mandates. The stories in the media only capture the firings, but a ton more left before getting fired, simply because they had no desire to be fired.
2170.
by yucky 5y ago
I was not yet born, but from my generation every single American can tell you where they were when the World Trade Centers fell. JFK assassination was maybe even more significant to Americans alive then. And let's be honest, it strains
2171.
by yucky 5y ago
> 20-30 year olds hanging out are not the ones causing the spread or hospitalizations. They're not? Logic would dictate that the cohort which is most sociable and least likely to be symptomatic, would be the most likely to cause s
2172.
by yucky 5y ago
>it's perhaps reasonable for him to have eventually forgotten the name of the particular place he was when he heard the news If he had been any place other than a block from the assassination, that might make more sense. Especially
2173.
by yucky 5y ago
Well, we know the virus existed in the lab in Wuhan. If we don't have any evidence of it existing elsewhere, maybe the simplest explanation is the correct one. The bigger issue people have is that discussion has been so heavily censore
2174.
by yucky 5y ago
Not as fringe as you might think. I think the two biggest red flags on it are that he claimed to one of his biographers to not recall where he was when he found out JFK had been killed. An odd thing for anybody to say who was not just alive