yucky

73 ms·

901.
by yucky 4y ago
anticipating a messy collision Ah yes, the backbone of current day journalism.
902.
by yucky 4y ago
But wait, when people said they shouldn't censor unpopular or non-mainstream speech due to them being "a global town square", they protested that they were simply a website and people were free to make their own Twitter. What
903.
by yucky 4y ago
I was referring to this being made into some huge news story, when literally nothing changed. Why were we not blasted with scary missives about this consent decree 2 months ago or 2 years ago? There are people trying to flood the internet w
904.
by yucky 4y ago
I don't understand, Twitter lost money every single day for over a decade. Why exactly would anybody from the previous regime be kept?
905.
by yucky 4y ago
It's fascinating to watch all of the powers that be fighting this ownership change so hard. I wonder why they found control of Twitter so important..?
906.
by yucky 4y ago
English is my second language, so, I might be missing some nuance. Indeed you are, but had I known English was your 2nd language it would have made more sense and I probably wouldn't have even corrected you since your English
907.
by yucky 4y ago
Saying that something is wrong doesn't imply (at least for me) that you're 100% sure that it's wrong. This is wrong. Words have meanings.
908.
by yucky 4y ago
You said: "Because part of the process of saying that something is wrong is being willing to learn that maybe you are the wrong one." So which is it? Are they wrong for sure, or are you willing to learn that you may be th
909.
by yucky 4y ago
TV was passive. And what you watched wasn't tied to your public identity for life.
910.
by yucky 4y ago
Because part of the process of saying that something is wrong is being willing to learn that maybe you are the wrong one. Ironically, you are wrong. Not only are there better ways to let people know they're wrong when you&#x27
911.
by yucky 4y ago
The reason people don't try to pull their money out all at once is because their deposits are insured, because their bank pays into an insurance pool. Only up to $250k.
912.
by yucky 4y ago
When did the CIA stop using the media to plant stories and manipulate the public? Serious question.
913.
by yucky 4y ago
If everybody walked into their bank right now to withdrawal, they couldn't cover either. Right?
914.
by yucky 4y ago
More than it's worth financially or as a tool to control narrative in the US? I mean, why do you think certain people are so apoplectic about it? We pretended it didn't shape the narrative in the country until the wrong guy got ah
915.
by yucky 4y ago
Musk announced buying Twitter, immediately liquidated $10B of Tesla stock without deal being even written down Or he knew Tesla was way overvalued at the time (which turned out to be true) and needed an excuse to liquidate a huge
916.
by yucky 4y ago
In my analogy the fox is war profiteers and the hen house is the rest of society. ISW is always pro-war. They are Neocons, it is a foundational part of their ideology. Any drivel coming from that place needs to be viewed through that lens.
917.
by yucky 4y ago
My guess is it's due to her actually being a figurehead for her parents social media efforts. It annoys people.
918.
by yucky 4y ago
I think as long as people wishing to know more about the situation with the fox in the hen house don't mind reading the latest updates from the actual fox itself, then sure. These aren't just war cheerleaders, the ISW is literally
919.
by yucky 4y ago
That transition is obviously not complete yet, since it's just announced. In the meantime I'm sure he'll be fine on Mastonod or whatever it is these influencers are moving to.
920.
by yucky 4y ago
mostly from coverage that I've seen at UnderstandingWar.org Fair warning, that site is a blog run by a neocon think tank, headed by the King NeoCon himself Bill Kristol. This is the weapons of mass destruction crew, nothing t
921.
by yucky 4y ago
He had a blue check which means his identity was verified, and then he changed his identity to impersonate someone else. That has always been against the rules. He is free to tweet about how much of an asshole Elon is (free speech), he wasn
922.
by yucky 4y ago
It's worked well for China.
923.
by yucky 4y ago
You didn't present any evidence. You posted a screenshot of a tweet where somebody said something that is incorrect. We know that activists target advertisers and investors. It's not just a fact, it is their stated goal and they h
924.
by yucky 4y ago
He could be the Pope or the President, he said something ignorant and/or demonstrably incorrect and got called out. He's wrong, and if you believe what he said to be true, then you are wrong too. Facts are a thing, and they matter
925.
by yucky 4y ago
>Twitter is a platform for elites. This is why they're so over the top furious with Elon.
926.
by yucky 4y ago
The full court media press against all things Elon is...instructive.
927.
by yucky 4y ago
I gave you references that prove it. Activists targeting investors and advertisers is not a boogieman, it's literally their publicly stated objective.
928.
by yucky 4y ago
You claim that, and yet ALL of the most celebrated CRT authors and "experts" all espouse the need to institute racially discriminatory policies in the interests of racial equity. So if every single proponent of CRT espouses suppor
929.
by yucky 4y ago
I suppose the intent is to make us not trust Trump, but for those of us who already didn't, it confirms that we should not trust Homeland Security. So now when they say " Top law enforcement officials say the biggest domestic terr
930.
by yucky 4y ago
They are inseparable. No reason to gaslight. Anybody who believes in treating people differently based on the color of their skin (which is a core tenet of CRT), supports racial discrimination by definition .

More ›