yucky

58 ms·

751.
by yucky 4y ago
"In order to have a valid citizenship ID you must submit to your biannual Multivax Booster+ Gold (or Platinum) plan sponsored by Pfizer" I'm agnostic and always found these sorts of religious doomsday proclamations to be ex
752.
by yucky 4y ago
That policy was never used to remove content published by NY Times, WaPo etc. that had originated from hacks or stolen material. In fact, this was the only time they used this policy in that manner to restrict content published by legitimat
753.
by yucky 4y ago
There is another option, sure to be unpopular here: learn a new trade. If you find yourself automated out of a job you can spend your life trying to swim against the inevitable, or learn new skills that still have value.
754.
by yucky 4y ago
It depends on what matters to people. In the US, there have been a number of significant platform shifts in the major parties over the last 10 years. Think of Trump vs mainstream Republicans, or the shift in the Democratic party from suppor
755.
by yucky 4y ago
> If a company has an almost defacto monopoly and stops people from talking about something, it's effectively the same as a government doing it. I would take it a step further and say that since the US Government has speci
756.
by yucky 4y ago
Credible proof to you = random twits from nobodies? Well, I think we've identified the issue. Please don't look up flat earth tweets, it will break you heart.
757.
by yucky 4y ago
What if the goal is bigger, to shift from a unipolar world dominated by US to a multipolar world?
758.
by yucky 4y ago
I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.
759.
by yucky 4y ago
You must be replying to the wrong comment. Nothing you have said is related to my post.
760.
by yucky 4y ago
> But I'm not an american, I could be wrong Yes, this is the case here. There are a number of issues that matter enough to make people switch parties, particularly the more moderate people in each party. In fact you can see
761.
by yucky 4y ago
Biden was Vice President at the time the Hunter Biden emails selling access to him were sent, which is exactly what the story was about. "10% for the Big Guy" while he was VP should definitely be a story when that same former VP w
762.
by yucky 4y ago
Biden was Vice President at the time of the emails in question, which is what the Hunter Biden story was always about. That the story was suppressed by Twitter while Trump was in office isn't relevant. The suppression of the story is w
763.
by yucky 4y ago
That was one blogger and a handful of commenters on 4chan, by your own admission. Could you edit your comment to remove the word "everyone" since that is clearly not accurate? The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about
764.
by yucky 4y ago
It's called "IP warming". When you send bulk emails, there are throttling limits and other things meant to decrease the ability of scammers. So to warm the IP up you have to send on it for awhile. These sorts of blank emails
765.
by yucky 4y ago
> The gun accidentally discharged and both sides started firing. Well it didn't exactly discharge into the floor, it discharged into a person and killed him. And the armed mob that stormed the police station wasn't su
766.
by yucky 4y ago
This leaves out the crucial fact that the police were not threatening to lynch anybody, they had the guy in jail and told the protestors who were threatening him to piss off. Then a group of armed black men escalated the situation further
767.
by yucky 4y ago
> They seem to be way less opposed for government to bail out corporations from same tax money tho. Not really. We had nationwide Occupy protests about exactly that, from both sides of the aisle. Not only leftists were fed up,
768.
by yucky 4y ago
If you re-read my post I think it will make more sense. Ranking naturally (SEO) often costs FAR more, so running even a small paid campaign can help those with smaller pockets strategically focus their efforts and is often the only option t
769.
by yucky 4y ago
> But I don't see how they increase the free and open exchange of information on the web. I think I can help explain. Almost all search engine users (~95%+) only scan the first 10-20 results on a query, and those results a
770.
by yucky 4y ago
Or those early transactions are the only reason it ever grew into the behemoth it became. So if you were an early adopter, spending a little to make the rest of your stash valuable could be seen as an investment. If the guy didn't buy
771.
by yucky 4y ago
Well that's debatable. It depends entirely on how you define "healthy". We tend to look at things from a Western perspective, but that's rather presumptive isn't it?
772.
by yucky 4y ago
In 2008 Apple wasn't even in the top 15 US companies by market cap. Now they're the largest US company by quite a margin. The data says their approach was correct.
773.
by yucky 4y ago
Exactly what you're seeing. Move semiconductor industry out of Taiwan so then when China takes it, disruption is lessened.
774.
by yucky 4y ago
How do they justify having browsers in the app store then? There is more objectionable content found on browsers than any other type of app, and it's not close.
775.
by yucky 4y ago
What could possibly go wrong trusting all of your passwords to a single point of failure?
776.
by yucky 4y ago
The issue is when you buy an apple phone you're not leasing it.
777.
by yucky 4y ago
Hasn't EU immigration policy already flooded the EU with refugees..?
778.
by yucky 4y ago
You're right of course, at the individual level. But on the macro level something is clearly broken with Gen Z and their ability to interact in social situations. Anything that can get them interacting with humans more on a regular bas
779.
by yucky 4y ago
> but for the would-be occupants, what's the benefit? Learning the crucial skill of socializing with other humans, in real life. I suspect a lot of the self-reported misery and disconnectedness they report is due to being m
780.
by yucky 4y ago
The argument for this is that it removes the argument of "cops life in danger" which they think will reduce or eliminate shootings of unarmed suspects. There are several arguments against this, but the one that concerns me most is

More ›